Orrell Facilities Q3 Business Review

Customer QBR presentation for an account’s executives

Orrell Facilities set three goals at onboarding in March, and this is the deck its vendor presents to Orrell’s COO two quarters later. Slide two reports against those three goals before anything else, because a customer QBR that opens on the vendor’s roadmap tells the customer the meeting is not about them.

Create a presentation with OneCraft10 slides, read in order

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

QUARTERLY BUSINESS REVIEW

Orrell, Q3

Presented to the Orrell Facilities executive team

Nadia Okonkwo

Account Director, the vendor team

Date

9 October 2026

Slide 1 · cover · A plain cover naming both companies and the date, because this deck belongs to the customer.

The goals you set in March

Where the goals stand after two quarters

The one still short of target

Work orders closed within their SLA window

Service levels

89%

↑ 18 pts since March, goal is 90%

Asset register complete across all eight sites

Asset data

100%

↑ done in July, goal was 100%

Contractor invoices matched without dispute

Finance

96%

↑ 10 pts since March, no goal set

Technicians using the app for every job

Adoption

82%

↑ 9 pts since March, goal is 85%

Preventive tasks completed on schedule

Maintenance

78%

→ module not yet enabled

Overdue backlog cleared from the March peak

Backlog

96

↓ from 412 open work orders

02

Slide 2 · metrics · Slide two reports against the three goals Orrell set at onboarding, target beside score.

Adoption by site

Technician app adoption across the eight sites. Kelford and Marsh Lane hold the average down.

0%25%50%75%100%
Northgate
Dockside
Airport West
Central
Riverview
Southyards
Kelford
Marsh Lane
Adoption

03

Slide 3 · metrics · Adoption by site with the two lagging sites named, because averages hide them.

Volume against breaches

Work orders per month and SLA breach rate over six months.

Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
06121824
Work orders (00s)
Breach rate (%)

04

Slide 4 · metrics · Volume and breach rate on one chart: more work orders, fewer breaches.

Two quarters of change

March baseline against September.

MEASURE

MARCH

SEPT

CHANGE

Time to close

6.2 days

3.1 days

-50%

Overdue backlog

412

96

-77%

Invoices disputed

14%

4%

-10 pts

SLA compliance

71%

89%

+18 pts

App adoption

73%

82%

+9 pts

Repeat call-outs

9%

5%

-4 pts

The baseline captured at onboarding
Measured 30 September

05

Slide 5 · comparison · The before and after ledger: six operational measures, March against September.

Issues, both columns

Four open on the left of the grid, four resolved this quarter on the right.

Open: SSO for contractors

Scoped, ships with the November release.

Open: Kelford wifi

Dead zones block app use in bays 4 to 7.

Open: PDF exports slow

Reports over 200 pages time out; fix in QA.

Open: asset photos sync

Retry logic for low signal sites due October.

Fixed: invoice matching

Three way match live since 14 July.

Fixed: roster imports

Nightly sync from your HR system, 2 August.

Fixed: duplicate assets

Register de-duplicated, 380 merged, 19 August.

Fixed: mobile crashes

Android crash rate under 0.1% since 5 September.

06

Slide 6 · checklist · Open issues beside resolved ones, each with a date, because honesty is the QBR currency.

ROADMAP

What lands for Orrell

Workstream
Q4 26
Q1 27
Q2 27
Q3 27
Features
Contractor SSO
Preventive maintenance
Parts inventory
Energy dashboards
Integrations
HR roster sync v2
Finance system export
BMS alarm intake
Meter data feed
Mobile
Offline photo sync
Voice notes on jobs
Barcode scanning
Wearable alerts
Reporting
Faster PDF engine
Board pack template
Site benchmarking
Custom KPIs
Dates are our current plan and are not contractual commitments.

07

Slide 7 · timeline · Only the roadmap rows relevant to Orrell, by quarter, features and integrations.

What we recommend next

Each recommendation traces to a slide behind us: the two lagging sites from the adoption chart, the preventive module from the goals slide, and the technician intake that drives both.

Lift The Two Sites

  • Fix Kelford wifi in bays 4 to 7
  • Rerun floor training at Marsh Lane
  • Site champions named at both
  • Target: 85% adoption by December

Switch On Preventive

  • Enable the PM module on all sites
  • Load the 1,900 asset service plans
  • Start with statutory compliance tasks
  • Cuts reactive volume an expected 15%

Train The Intake

  • 12 new technicians start in November
  • App training inside their induction
  • Refresher for the 8 lowest active users
  • Keeps adoption ahead of headcount

08

Slide 8 · pillars · Three recommendations that address the two weak sites and the missing module.

IF YOU WANT IT

The expansion option

EXPANSION

Two sites plus preventive

$2,400

per month

Adds the Kelford annex and Depot 9

Preventive maintenance module, all sites

From 1 January 2027

24 month term, current rates held

Training for the November intake included

Decide by 1 Dec

09

Slide 9 · pricing · The expansion option as one card with a price and a start date, after the value, never before.

THURSDAY

9

October 2026

The next 90 days, already scheduled

Every commitment from this review has a date and an owner before we leave the room.

Wk 42

1 WEEK

Kelford wifi

Orrell IT patches bays 4 to 7; we retest adoption.

Orrell IT + us

Wk 43

2 DAYS

Marsh Lane training

Floor training rerun across both shifts.

Site team

Wk 45

1 DAY

SSO go live

Contractor SSO ships and rolls out same week.

Vendor eng

Wk 46

3 DAYS

Intake training

The 12 new technicians trained inside induction.

Trainers + HR

Wk 49

30 MIN

Expansion call

Yes or no on the January expansion option.

COO + Nadia

Wk 2

90 MIN

Q4 review

Next business review, 15 January, this room.

Exec team

10

Slide 10 · calendar · The next 90 days as one working day of commitments, ending at the next review.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
A plain cover naming both companies and the date, because this deck belongs to the customer.
Slide 2metrics
Slide two reports against the three goals Orrell set at onboarding, target beside score.
Slide 3metrics
Adoption by site with the two lagging sites named, because averages hide them.
Slide 4metrics
Volume and breach rate on one chart: more work orders, fewer breaches.
Slide 5comparison
The before and after ledger: six operational measures, March against September.
Slide 6checklist
Open issues beside resolved ones, each with a date, because honesty is the QBR currency.
Slide 7timeline
Only the roadmap rows relevant to Orrell, by quarter, features and integrations.
Slide 8pillars
Three recommendations that address the two weak sites and the missing module.
Slide 9pricing
The expansion option as one card with a price and a start date, after the value, never before.
Slide 10calendar
The next 90 days as one working day of commitments, ending at the next review.

How to adapt this deck

A seat based SaaS account swaps adoption by site for adoption by team and the SLA lines for usage depth, but the goals first order holds. An agency running this for a retainer client replaces the roadmap with the next campaign calendar and the issues grid with a deliverables ledger. With no expansion to offer, drop slide nine entirely rather than padding it; a QBR with no ask at all is itself a message, and often the right one in a rocky quarter. This deck reviews the same fictional customer that the customer onboarding deck example kicks off, two quarters later, so the pair shows the full arc from kickoff goals to reviewed results.

Sales QBR, customer QBR or internal QBR?

This page is the customer facing one. The sales QBR deck reviews a sales team’s quarter internally, and the quarterly business review deck covers the whole company against plan. All three share a name and almost nothing else; the linked examples make the differences concrete.

What makes this deck work

Slide two reports against the customer’s own goals

The three goals set at March onboarding come back with scores beside targets: SLA closure at 89% against a 90% goal, the asset register done, adoption at 82% against 85%. Opening on the customer’s scoreboard, including the two lines still short, sets the meeting’s frame as their outcomes, not the vendor’s features.

The weak sites are named, and the plan addresses them

The adoption chart shows eight sites from 96% down to 54%, with Kelford and Marsh Lane holding the average down, and the recommendations slide then commits to a wifi fix and re-training at exactly those two sites. Naming the laggards makes the average believable and the plan specific.

The expansion ask is one card, after the value

The $2,400 a month expansion sits on slide nine as a single card with a start date and a decision deadline, after two quarters of measured value and an honest issues slide. An ask positioned there reads as a next step; the same card on slide three would have poisoned the meeting.

Questions people ask

What is a customer QBR?

A quarterly meeting where a vendor shows a customer’s executives what the product actually delivered, reviewed against goals the customer set. It is an account health and value conversation, distinct from support reviews and from the vendor’s internal QBRs, and this example is the deck for that meeting.

What should a customer QBR include?

Progress against agreed goals, adoption or usage with the weak spots named, an honest issues ledger, the roadmap slice relevant to this account, recommendations and the next 90 days. This deck adds one optional slide: a priced expansion, positioned after the value story.

Who should attend a customer QBR?

The customer’s executive sponsor plus the operational owner, and from the vendor the account director with someone who can commit engineering dates. This deck is written for a COO: site names, SLA numbers and dollar figures, no feature tour. If only operational contacts attend, the goals slide still leads.

Should pricing appear in a customer QBR?

Only as a single, clearly optional expansion after the value has been demonstrated, the way slide nine offers two sites and a module for $2,400 a month from January. Turning a QBR into a renewal negotiation destroys the trust the meeting exists to build; one card with a deadline keeps it an offer.

How do I handle open issues honestly?

List them beside the fixes, dated. This deck shows four open issues and four resolved this quarter in one grid, each with a date or a ship window. Customers already know the open issues; the slide is the vendor proving it knows them too, and that knowledge has a schedule attached.

Can I send the deck as a link before the meeting?

Yes. The share link is read only and always serves the latest saved version, so the pre-send stays current through last minute number updates. Speaker notes are visible to anyone with the link via the N key, so keep internal commentary out of the notes on customer facing decks.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make my customer qbr presentation for an account’s executives

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Share a presentation with a link, then Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .