Ostrolea Facilities: $1.1M Cost Reduction Proposal

Cost reduction proposal deck: $1.1M found, line by line

A cost reduction proposal has to prove to a board that the savings are specific, achievable on a stated timetable and will not damage the service customers pay for. Ostrolea Facilities, an invented Melbourne cleaning company, finds $1.1M a year in five initiatives, costs the change at $260K, compares two rejected options and lists the five things it will not touch.

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

$1.1M FOUND

Cost reduction proposal, line by line, in place by FY28

OF

CFO and operations director

Board paper, October 2026

Slide 1 · cover · States the saving, the timing and what is protected, before the first initiative.

Why now

The three year plan approved in August lifts EBITDA margin from 7.5 to 10 percent by FY29. Growth alone cannot do it: wage rises outpaced price rises in FY26. This proposal finds $1.1M a year in the existing cost base.

THE STARTING POINT, FY26

$22.2M of costs

On $24.0M of revenue, leaving $1.8M of EBITDA, a 7.5 percent margin.

71% is labour

Wages and on costs for 640 staff are $15.8M, most under the cleaning award.

$6.4M of the rest

Vehicles, consumables, subcontractors, property and systems.

Target 10% by FY29

The plan approved in August needs margin to rise 2.5 points in three years.

02

Slide 2 · intro · Why cost has to come down now, tied to the margin target in the three year plan.

Savings by initiative, $K a year

Five initiatives build to $1,100K a year, taking annual cost from $22.2M to $21.1M on the FY26 base.

Rosters
Fleet
Supplies
Subcon
Office
Total
03006009001200

03

Slide 3 · metrics · The waterfall of savings, one bar per initiative, building to the $1.1M total.

Five initiatives

Annual saving at full run rate, with the effort to deliver it and the risk that it slips.

Initiative
Saving a year
Effort
Risk
Roster by site demand, cut overtime
$400K
High, new app
Medium
Fleet: 48 to 40 vans, shared routes
$250K
Medium
Low
One consumables supplier, set par levels
$200K
Low
Low
Bring window cleaning in house
$150K
Medium, hiring
Medium
Sublease half the head office floor
$100K
Low
Medium, tenant
Total
$1,100K
Mixed
Medium overall
Savings are annual run rate. One off costs of $260K are separate and shown on slide six.

04

Slide 4 · comparison · Each initiative with saving, effort and risk, so the board can see which savings are easy and which are not.

When the savings arrive

Annualised run rate at the end of each half year. Full $1.1M in place by June 2028, the end of FY28.

1

FY27 H1, to Dec 26

Consumables supplier and par levels live. Run rate $200K a year.

2

FY27 H2, to Jun 27

Fleet down to 40 vans, office sublease signed. Run rate $550K.

3

FY28 H1, to Dec 27

Window cleaning in house. Rostering app at three of five regions. $850K.

4

FY28 H2, to Jun 28

Rostering at all regions. Full run rate of $1.1M a year from July.

05

Slide 5 · timeline · When the savings arrive, quarter by quarter, so the margin targets in the plan can be checked.

What it costs to save

One off costs, spent over FY27 and FY28, recovered in under four months at full run rate.

$260K

One off cost, about three months of the $1.1M annual saving

$140K

Rostering app rollout

Licences in year one, configuration and training for 38 supervisors. Part of the plan's systems spend.

$70K

Window cleaning set up

Equipment, height safety training and two vans moved from the retired fleet.

$50K

Office and fleet exit

Make good on the sublet floor and early termination of eight van leases.

06

Slide 6 · investment · The one off cost of getting the savings and how fast it pays back.

Three ways to find $1.1M

Option B is recommended. A and C were costed and rejected.

A: Cut hours

How
Reduce cleaning hours on every contract by about 7 percent.
Speed
Fast: savings in the first quarter.
Why not
Breaches contracted service levels and puts 94 percent client retention at risk.

B: Five fixes

How
Rostering, fleet, consumables, window cleaning and office space.
Speed
Full $1.1M by June 2028.
Why this one
No change to service levels or pay rates, and $260K one off cost recovered in months.

C: Price rise

How
A 5 percent price rise across all contracts at renewal.
Speed
Over two years as contracts renew.
Why not
Clients already absorbed the award increase, and two large contracts would go to tender.

07

Slide 7 · comparison · The options considered, including the ones rejected, so the board sees why this mix was chosen.

What is protected

Five lines the cost programme does not touch.

Contracted cleaning hours

Every client receives the hours and frequency in its contract.

Pay rates and conditions

No change to award rates, penalty rates or permanent part time contracts.

Safety and training

Height safety, chemical handling and infection control budgets stay whole.

Site supervisors

Supervisor numbers rise with the three year plan, from 38 to 50.

Healthcare expansion

The $1.2M healthcare capability investment goes ahead as planned.

08

Slide 8 · checklist · What the proposal deliberately protects, so staff and clients hear what is not on the table.

Approve the five initiatives and $260K

Savings tracked against the run rate on slide five and reported to the board every quarter alongside the three year plan.

First progress report at the February 2027 board meeting

09

Slide 9 · closing · Asks for approval and states how progress will be reported.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
States the saving, the timing and what is protected, before the first initiative.
Slide 2intro
Why cost has to come down now, tied to the margin target in the three year plan.
Slide 3metrics
The waterfall of savings, one bar per initiative, building to the $1.1M total.
Slide 4comparison
Each initiative with saving, effort and risk, so the board can see which savings are easy and which are not.
Slide 5timeline
When the savings arrive, quarter by quarter, so the margin targets in the plan can be checked.
Slide 6investment
The one off cost of getting the savings and how fast it pays back.
Slide 7comparison
The options considered, including the ones rejected, so the board sees why this mix was chosen.
Slide 8checklist
What the proposal deliberately protects, so staff and clients hear what is not on the table.
Slide 9closing
Asks for approval and states how progress will be reported.

Slide by slide

Slide one states $1.1M and the timing. Slide two explains why now: $22.2M of costs on $24.0M of revenue, 71 percent of it labour, and a margin target of 10 percent by FY29. Slide three is the savings waterfall. Slide four is the initiative table with saving, effort and risk. Slide five phases the savings by half year. Slide six costs the change at $260K, about three months of the annual saving. Slide seven compares three options. Slide eight lists what is protected. Slide nine asks for approval and sets the first progress report for February 2027.

How to adapt this deck

A business cutting cost because revenue has fallen should lead with the cash position rather than the margin target, and add a slide on how quickly each saving reaches the bank. If any initiative involves redundancies, give it its own slide with the consultation steps and get employment advice before the paper goes out. A manufacturer should replace the fleet and office lines with materials, energy and scrap, and show unit cost before and after on the waterfall.

What business guidance says

Business.gov.au advises reviewing costs regularly, especially as costs rise, noting that some costs cannot be avoided but small changes can make a big difference. Its pricing guidance stresses knowing the full cost of delivering a service and the margin needed to cover it. For an award covered workforce, the Fair Work Commission's annual wage review sets minimum rates each year, which is why this proposal finds savings outside pay rates rather than inside them.

What makes this deck work

The total is built, not asserted

The waterfall on slide three stacks $400K from rostering, $250K from the fleet, $200K from consumables, $150K from window cleaning and $100K from the office into a $1,100K total. Each bar matches a row in the table on slide four, where the effort and risk sit beside it.

Timing is honest about the slow lines

Slide five shows the run rate at the end of each half year: $200K, $550K, $850K, then the full $1.1M by June 2028. The largest saving, rostering, comes last because it needs an app. A board can match these steps against the margin targets it already approved.

It says what is off the table

Slide eight protects contracted hours, pay rates, safety training, supervisor numbers and the healthcare investment. Slide seven shows why: cutting hours by 7 percent was costed and rejected because it puts 94 percent client retention at risk. Staff and clients can hear the plan without fearing it.

Questions people ask

What goes in a cost reduction proposal presentation?

Why costs must fall, each initiative with its annual saving, the effort and risk to deliver it, when the savings arrive, the one off cost, the options considered and rejected, what is protected, and the decision you need. Nine slides is enough for a board.

How do I show cost savings in a waterfall chart?

Give each initiative one bar, in descending size, and end with a total bar that equals their sum. Use one unit throughout, such as thousands of dollars, and put the sum in the description so nobody reads values from the axis. Short bar labels keep the axis readable.

Should a cost cutting deck show the options that were rejected?

Yes. Boards and staff will ask why you did not simply cut hours or raise prices. Costing those options and saying why they were rejected, with a number for each, shows the recommendation was chosen, not defaulted to, and answers the obvious questions in advance.

How do I make cost savings believable to a board?

Tie every saving to a specific action, an owner and a date, rate the effort and risk honestly, phase the savings over time rather than claiming them all at once, and report progress against the run rate each quarter. Boards trust smaller numbers with a timetable over big round ones.

Do one off costs belong in a savings proposal?

They do. Show them on their own slide with a payback period, such as $260K recovered in about three months at full run rate. Hiding the cost to change makes the savings look larger in the first year than they will be, which finance will spot at once.

Can I keep updating the savings figures after the board meeting?

Yes. Edit the chart values and table cells directly on the slides and save. Every save is kept as a version, so the deck the board approved can be previewed or restored later, and a share link always shows the latest saved figures.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides, then Export a presentation to PowerPoint or PDF. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .