Trackhollow Engineering Headcount Plan 2027

Headcount plan presentation: roles by quarter and cost

A headcount plan presentation has to prove to the executive team and finance that every new role is tied to work the business has already committed to, that the team can actually hire at that pace, and what it costs this year and next. Trackhollow, an invented route planning software company, takes engineering from 46 to 60 people in 2027 with fourteen roles, each with a quarter, a level and a cost.

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

TRACKHOLLOW

Engineering headcount plan · 2027

From 46 to 60 engineers in four quarters

Fourteen new roles, $2.48M a year at full run rate, $1.24M in 2027.

Daniel Ferreira, VP Engineering

For the executive team and finance, November 2026

Approval paper

Slide 1 · cover · States the start and end headcount and the cost, so the approvers know the size of the decision.

WHY NOW

Three reasons

The 2027 roadmap commits to multi depot routing, an Android driver app and live delivery windows. At today's size, the routing team can deliver one of those three by the end of the year.

1
Multi depot routing

The largest customer request. Needs two optimisation scientists the team does not have.

2
The Android driver app

41 percent of drivers use Android and get a web app. Needs mobile engineers and a lead.

3
Reliability at scale

Routes planned per day doubled in 2026. Platform has no on call depth beyond four people.

02

Slide 2 · pillars · Says why the team has to grow, in terms of the product roadmap rather than workload.

Engineers by team, end of quarter

From 46 at the end of 2026 to 60 at the end of 2027. Routing and platform grow first, mobile and data later.

Q4 2026
Q1 2027
Q2 2027
Q3 2027
Q4 2027
015304560
Routing
Platform
Mobile
Data

03

Slide 3 · metrics · Headcount by team each quarter, so the shape of the growth is visible, not only the total.

ROLES BY QUARTER

Fourteen roles, level and cost

Quarter
Roles and levels
Teams
Hires
Annual cost
Q1
Senior backend (L4), engineering manager (M1), data engineer (L3)
Routing, Platform, Data
3
$540K
Q2
Two optimisation scientists (L5), SRE (L4), iOS engineer (L3)
Routing, Platform, Mobile
4
$760K
Q3
Backend (L3), platform (L3), Android (L3), analytics (L3)
All four teams
4
$595K
Q4
Security (L4), mobile lead (L5), ML engineer (L4)
Platform, Mobile, Data
3
$585K
Total
Fourteen new roles, no backfills included
Four teams
14
$2,480K
Annual cost is salary plus on costs at the midpoint of each level band.

04

Slide 4 · timeline · Every new role by quarter with level and annual cost, which is the table finance signs.

Can we hire this fast

Six engineers left in 2026, 13 percent of the team, so about six backfills come on top of the fourteen new roles: twenty hires in total. At 52 days median time to hire, two recruiters can carry that load if offers keep being accepted at the 2026 rate.

13%

Engineering attrition in 2026

52 days

Median time to hire

78%

Offer acceptance rate

05

Slide 5 · metrics · Attrition and time to hire, because they decide whether fourteen hires in a year is possible.

The org at the end of 2027

Four teams, each with a manager and a technical lead. Routing becomes two squads during the year.

Routing (18)

Owns

The route optimiser, multi depot routing and delivery window promises.

Changes

Splits into two squads in Q2. The current tech lead becomes the second manager.

Platform (16)

Owns

APIs, infrastructure, security and the on call rota for every team.

Changes

Gets its own engineering manager in Q1 and a security engineer in Q4.

Mobile (14)

Owns

The driver apps on iOS and the new Android app, plus offline sync.

Changes

A mobile lead joins in Q4 to run both platforms as one team.

Data (12)

Owns

Pipelines, customer reporting and the models behind arrival times.

Changes

Adds analytics and machine learning roles in the second half.

06

Slide 6 · framework · The org design at the end of 2027: four teams, what each owns and how it grows.

What it costs

Hires start through the year, so 2027 cost sits below the run rate. Backfills are already budgeted.

$1.24M

Cost in 2027, rising to $2.48M a year from 2028 at full run rate

Q1 hires, 3 roles

$472K

$540K a year, about ten and a half months of cost in 2027

Q2 hires, 4 roles

$475K

$760K a year, about seven and a half months in 2027

Q3 hires, 4 roles

$223K

$595K a year, about four and a half months in 2027

Q4 hires, 3 roles

$73K

$585K a year, about one and a half months in 2027

Recruiting

$0

Two in house recruiters already budgeted, no agency fees planned

Equipment and tools

Included

Laptops and licences are inside the per head on costs above

07

Slide 7 · investment · What the plan costs this year and at full run rate, split the way finance budgets it.

Approvals, in order

Each step has an owner and a date. Q1 roles cannot open until step four.

01

Executive team

Plan and total cost

Approve fourteen roles and $1.24M for 2027 at this meeting.

02

Finance

Budget lines

Load the quarterly cost into the 2027 budget by 6 December.

03

People team

Levels and bands

Confirm each role level and salary band by 13 December.

04

CEO

Q1 requisitions

Sign the three Q1 requisitions so adverts go live on 6 January.

05

Each quarter

Release the next roles

Next quarter roles open only if attrition stays under 15 percent.

08

Slide 8 · checklist · The approvals needed and in what order, so nothing stalls between this meeting and the first offer.

Approve fourteen roles for 2027

The plan pauses automatically if engineering attrition passes 15 percent or the routing roadmap moves out of 2027.

Decision needed today so Q1 adverts can go live on 6 January

09

Slide 9 · closing · Asks for the one decision and names the condition that would pause the plan.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
States the start and end headcount and the cost, so the approvers know the size of the decision.
Slide 2pillars
Says why the team has to grow, in terms of the product roadmap rather than workload.
Slide 3metrics
Headcount by team each quarter, so the shape of the growth is visible, not only the total.
Slide 4timeline
Every new role by quarter with level and annual cost, which is the table finance signs.
Slide 5metrics
Attrition and time to hire, because they decide whether fourteen hires in a year is possible.
Slide 6framework
The org design at the end of 2027: four teams, what each owns and how it grows.
Slide 7investment
What the plan costs this year and at full run rate, split the way finance budgets it.
Slide 8checklist
The approvals needed and in what order, so nothing stalls between this meeting and the first offer.
Slide 9closing
Asks for the one decision and names the condition that would pause the plan.

Slide by slide

Slide one states 46 to 60 engineers and the cost. Slide two gives three roadmap reasons to grow: multi depot routing, the Android driver app and reliability at scale. Slide three is a stacked column chart of engineers by team at the end of each quarter. Slide four is the table of roles by quarter. Slide five checks hiring capacity against attrition and time to hire. Slide six shows the org at the end of 2027, what each team owns and how it changes. Slide seven breaks down the in year cost by quarter of hire. Slide eight lists five approvals in order with dates. Slide nine asks for the decision and names the conditions that would pause the plan.

How to adapt this deck

A sales headcount plan should replace the roadmap reasons with quota capacity, showing how many reps the revenue target needs at current productivity and ramp time. A plan that includes cutting roles should add a separate slide for them and keep the language plain. A company hiring across several countries should add a location column to the role table, since cost and time to hire differ sharply by market and finance will budget them separately.

What workforce planning guidance says

The CIPD describes workforce planning as balancing labour supply against demand: analysing the current workforce, working out future needs, finding the gap and acting to close it. The US Office of Personnel Management's guide sets out five steps, from setting strategic direction through workforce analysis of demand, supply, gap and risk to an action plan that is monitored and revised. This deck follows the same order: roadmap demand, current supply, the gap as fourteen roles, and a quarterly check before each release.

What makes this deck work

Each role has a quarter, a level and a price

Slide four lists the fourteen roles by quarter with levels such as L4 and M1, the teams they join and annual cost: $540K, $760K, $595K and $585K, totalling $2,480K. Finance can load it straight into the budget, and the people team can check every level against a band.

Hiring capacity is checked, not assumed

Slide five turns 13 percent attrition into about six backfills on top of the fourteen new roles, twenty hires in all, and sets that against a 52 day median time to hire and 78 percent offer acceptance. The plan admits the real recruiting load before anyone approves it.

In year cost and run rate are both shown

Slide seven prices 2027 at $1.24M because hires start through the year, and says the run rate is $2.48M from 2028. A headcount plan that shows only the first number gets a bigger surprise in next year's budget, and finance knows it.

Questions people ask

What should a headcount plan presentation include?

Why the team needs to grow, headcount by team over time, each new role with its quarter, level and cost, attrition and hiring capacity, the org design at the end of the period, in year cost and run rate, and the approvals needed. Nine slides covers it for an executive meeting.

Should a headcount plan include backfills?

Show them, but keep them separate from new roles. Backfills replace people who leave and are usually already budgeted, while new roles add cost. Here 13 percent attrition implies about six backfills, so recruiting has twenty hires to make even though the plan asks for fourteen new roles.

How do I show headcount growth by team on a slide?

A stacked column chart with one column per quarter and one colour per team shows both the total and the mix. Keep it to four or five teams so the legend stays readable, and put the start and end totals in the description so nobody has to add the stacks.

Why show in year cost and full run rate separately?

Because people hired during the year cost less in that year than they will in the next. Fourteen roles here cost $1.24M in 2027 but $2.48M a year from 2028. Showing only the in year figure makes the plan look cheaper than it is and damages trust at the next budget round.

How do I get approval for new roles faster?

List the approvals in the order they happen, with an owner and a date for each, and tie the first requisitions to a specific start date. Adding a condition that pauses later roles, such as attrition above a set level, makes approvers more comfortable signing the whole year at once.

How do I share a headcount plan only with approvers?

Send the share link only to the approvers. It opens a read only view of the saved deck, and it can be disabled from the dashboard deck menu once the decision is made. An exported PDF travels outside the app, so attach it only to the approval email itself.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides, then Edit your deck with the AI assistant. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .