Fenwright Germany Go To Market

Go to market deck

Eleven slides from Fenwright, an invented UK workforce software company, taking an existing product into Germany. The plan picks one country and one segment inside it, says in writing what the other three growth quadrants are not going to get in 2027, prices for the new market rather than translating the home rate card, and ends on the two numbers that would stop it.

Create a presentation with OneCraft11 slides, read in order

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

GO TO MARKET

BOARD REVIEW · 3 NOVEMBER 2026

Germany,

One Segment

Eighteen third party logistics operators by December 2027, or we stop and say so.

Marek Hollis

CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER, FENWRIGHT

Slide 1 · cover · States the market, the segment and the deadline in one line, so the plan is falsifiable from slide one.

MARKET TIERS

Where We Start

Germany has 4,100 warehouses over ten thousand square metres, more than the next three European markets together. We are entering one segment of it, and we are entering nothing else until this one works.

Primary

Germany, and inside it only third party logistics operators with 200 to 900 warehouse staff. That is 640 companies, not 4,100 sites.

Adjacent

Austria, Switzerland and the Netherlands share the labour rules and the language of the contracts. They are 2028, not 2027.

Watch list

Poland has the warehouse growth but not the labour cost pressure that makes anyone buy this. We are watching, not selling.

02

Slide 2 · content · Names the beachhead and, more importantly, the two markets deliberately not being entered this year.

What This Is

Existing product, new market. The other three quadrants are things we are explicitly not doing in 2027.

Market Penetration

UK · existing product

Two hundred and ten UK customers and £14.8m of ARR. It funds Germany, and it keeps its own plan and its own team.

Market Development

Germany · existing product

This plan. The same product, localised, sold to a narrower segment than we sell to at home. Everything in this deck is about this quadrant.

Product Development

UK · new product

The transport module three UK customers keep asking for. Real demand, wrong year. It is deferred to 2028 in writing.

Diversification

New market · new product

Nothing. If a proposal arrives that sits in this quadrant during 2027, the answer is no and this slide is the reason.

03

Slide 3 · framework · Places the plan on a named growth framework, which is what stops it drifting into four plans at once.

The Buyer

A site operations director at a German third party logistics operator, from fourteen interviews in June and July.

Says

I do not have a planning problem, I have an absence problem. On a Monday in December I am forty people short and the shift starts in an hour.

Thinks

Another system means another integration with the works council watching. The last one took nine months and the union asked for a written agreement first.

Does

Runs the shift plan in a spreadsheet, rings two agencies at seven in the morning, and reconciles it against the WMS at the end of the week.

Feels

Judged on cost per pick and unable to control the biggest line in it. Wants evidence he can take to the works council, not a demo.

04

Slide 4 · persona · The economic buyer in their own words, taken from interviews rather than invented from a segment definition.

COMPETITION

Who Is Already There

Competitor
Pricing
Strengths
Weaknesses
Positioning
Zeitwerk
€90k, per site
Works council playbook
Twelve week implementation
The safe German choice
Palletier WFM
€55k, per site
Bundled with their WMS
Only if you run their WMS
The default add on
Excel and agencies
Free, plus agency fee
Nobody has to approve it
No forecast, no evidence
What 70 percent do
Kettle (US)
€120k, per company
Best forecasting engine
No German labour rules
The enterprise import
Fenwright
€48k, per company
Live in six weeks
No German reference yet
The one that starts fast
Prices are indicative annual figures for a 400 staff operator, taken from published rate cards and from buyer interviews.

05

Slide 5 · comparison · The honest competitive picture, including the incumbent that is winning on something we cannot match.

Packaging For Germany

Priced per company rather than per site, because a German operator with six sites will not buy six licences.

Feature
Standard
Works Council
Group
Annual price
€48,000
€66,000
€110,000
Warehouse staff covered
Up to 400
Up to 900
Unlimited
Sites included
2
6
Unlimited
Absence forecasting
Included
Included
Included
Works council reporting pack
Not included
Included
Included
Agency booking integration
One agency
Three agencies
Unlimited
Implementation
6 weeks, remote
8 weeks, on site
Scoped
Language
German and English
German and English
Plus Polish
The Works Council tier exists because eleven of the fourteen buyers we interviewed said the reporting pack was the thing that unblocks approval.

06

Slide 6 · pricing · Prices for the new market rather than translating the home price list, and says what is deliberately excluded.

The Motion

Inside sales from Manchester, two field days a month, and two integrators from Q3.

ASSUMED CONVERSION

100%

Named accounts

640 operators, all named

22%

First meeting

140 in the first year

9%

Pilot agreed

Two sites, eight weeks

3%

Signed

18 customers by December

Named accounts
All 640 German operators, listed by name.
First meeting
Booked from Manchester, not by an agency.
Pilot agreed
Two sites, eight weeks.
Signed
One contract per company.

07

Slide 7 · diagram · The motion as a funnel with the conversion assumptions written down, so the plan can be checked in month three.

The Launch Sequence

Six phases. Two of them are gates where the board can stop the plan.

Q4 2026

Localise the product and the contract. German language, German labour rules, and a DPA a works council will sign.

Q1 2027

Hire two German speaking inside sales people in Manchester. First 140 accounts contacted. Target four signed customers.

Q2 2027

Gate one. Nine cumulative customers or the plan pauses and the headcount goes back to the UK team.

Q3 2027

Two systems integrators signed as partners, each with two certified consultants. Fourteen cumulative customers.

Q4 2027

Eighteen cumulative customers, €864,000 of German ARR, and a first German reference customer on the record.

Q1 2028

Gate two. Open a Düsseldorf office and start Austria, or hold at eighteen customers and run it from Manchester.

08

Slide 8 · timeline · Six dated phases with a gate on each, so the plan can be stopped rather than only accelerated.

YEAR ONE

What We Are Committing To

Metric
Target
UK today
Status
Customers signed
18 by Dec 2027
210 total
Plan
Average contract value
€48,000
£41,000
Above UK
Customer acquisition cost
Under €62,000
£38,000
At risk
CAC payback
Under 16 months
11 months
At risk
LTV to CAC
3.4 to 1
4.1 to 1
Plan
German ARR, December 2027
€864,000
n/a
Plan
Gross margin
78 percent
81 percent
Plan
The two at risk lines are at risk on purpose. A new market costs more to sell into, and we would rather write the worse number down now.

09

Slide 9 · metrics · The unit economics the plan is signed against, with the two that are already behind marked as such.

Should we enter Germany in 2027?

VS

Pros

Cons

Market size: 4,100 large warehouses, more than the next three European markets together.

1

Labour cost: German warehouse wages rose 19 percent in three years, which is what makes anyone buy.

2

Same product: no new engineering beyond localisation and the works council pack.

3

Weak incumbent: the market leader takes twelve weeks to implement and we take six.

4

Funded from cash: no raise needed, and the UK business still grows 22 percent without this.

5

Reversible: gate one in June 2027 costs us two salaries and about £310,000 if we stop.

6
1

No reference: not one German logo, and this is a market that asks for one in the first meeting.

2

Works councils: every deal needs an approval we have never had to obtain before.

3

Longer cycles: seven months assumed against four at home, and that assumption is untested.

4

No local team: inside sales from Manchester will not survive contact with an enterprise buyer.

5

Distraction: the transport module three UK customers want is deferred a year to pay for this.

6

Partner risk: the Q3 integrator plan depends on two firms we have not yet signed.

10

Slide 10 · comparison · Weighs the decision honestly and names the numbers that would end the plan.
A tall vertical photograph of a modern warehouse aisle at night, high racking receding into shadow, pale blue LED light along the roof line, a pallet truck parked in the foreground, cold industrial palette, no people, no readable text, no logos
A tall vertical photograph of a modern warehouse aisle at night, high racking receding into shadow, pale blue LED light along the roof line, a pallet truck parked in the foreground, cold industrial palette, no people, no readable text, no logos

Two Hires,

One Gate

We are asking the board to approve two salaries and a localisation budget, not a German subsidiary. The decision that matters is in June 2027, and this plan is written so that saying no then is cheap.

Gate one: 30 June 2027, nine customers or we stop

Slide 11 · closing · Ends on the decision being asked for and the one date the whole plan turns on.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
States the market, the segment and the deadline in one line, so the plan is falsifiable from slide one.
Slide 2content
Names the beachhead and, more importantly, the two markets deliberately not being entered this year.
Slide 3framework
Places the plan on a named growth framework, which is what stops it drifting into four plans at once.
Slide 4persona
The economic buyer in their own words, taken from interviews rather than invented from a segment definition.
Slide 5comparison
The honest competitive picture, including the incumbent that is winning on something we cannot match.
Slide 6pricing
Prices for the new market rather than translating the home price list, and says what is deliberately excluded.
Slide 7diagram
The motion as a funnel with the conversion assumptions written down, so the plan can be checked in month three.
Slide 8timeline
Six dated phases with a gate on each, so the plan can be stopped rather than only accelerated.
Slide 9metrics
The unit economics the plan is signed against, with the two that are already behind marked as such.
Slide 10comparison
Weighs the decision honestly and names the numbers that would end the plan.
Slide 11closing
Ends on the decision being asked for and the one date the whole plan turns on.

What makes this deck work

It says what is not being done

The growth matrix marks three of its four quadrants as deferred, including a product three customers are asking for. A go to market plan fails more often from doing four things than from choosing the wrong one.

The at risk numbers are admitted

Acquisition cost and payback are both marked at risk against the home market, on the plan the company is asking its board to approve. Writing the worse number down first is what makes the rest of the scorecard readable.

The plan can be stopped

Two gates, one in June 2027 at nine customers, and a closing slide that prices stopping at about £310,000. A plan with a stated kill condition gets approved faster than one that only describes success.

Questions people ask

What slides go in a go to market deck?

The thesis, the market, segmentation, the chosen segment and ICP, the buyer, positioning against alternatives, pricing and packaging, the channel and motion, the launch sequence, unit economics and the risks.

What is the difference between a GTM strategy and a marketing plan?

A go to market plan decides which market, which segment, which motion and which price. A marketing plan decides the activity inside a motion that has already been chosen. The GTM plan comes first and has fewer, larger decisions in it.

How do I define an ICP versus a buyer persona?

The ideal customer profile describes the company: sector, size, geography, buying behaviour. The persona describes the human inside it. This deck defines the profile as third party logistics operators with 200 to 900 warehouse staff, then shows the site operations director separately.

What metrics should a go to market deck commit to?

Customer count, average contract value, acquisition cost, payback period and the ratio of lifetime value to acquisition cost, each against the home market. Payback benchmarks widen with segment, from around a year in small business to closer to two in enterprise.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make my go to market deck

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a presentation with AI, then export it to PowerPoint or PDF. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.