Routeworks Series C

Series C pitch deck that leads with efficiency over growth

A Series C pitch deck has to prove that growth is now bought efficiently, because late stage investors price the next dollar of ARR, not the last one. Routeworks, an invented delivery routing company, shows its burn multiple falling from 2.4 to 0.9 and four expansion markets each priced with its own payback.

Create a presentation with OneCraft12 slides, read in order

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

ROUTEWORKS

Series C: 48 million dollars of ARR at a 0.9 burn multiple

RW

September 2030, Sydney

Ivan Kraljevic, CEO

Slide 1 · cover · A formal cover with the efficiency claim, since a Series C is priced on how growth is bought.

THE THESIS

Efficiency over growth

Routeworks plans routes for last mile delivery fleets. Since the Series A in 2027 it has grown from 3.2 million to 48 million dollars of ARR in three markets. The more useful number is the burn multiple: 2.4 in the year to June 2027 and 0.9 in the year to June 2030. Every dollar this round spends has to clear the same bar, which is why the four markets on slide eight are priced, sequenced and individually paid back.

0.9
Burn multiple

Net burn of 15.3 million dollars against 17 million of net new ARR over the last twelve months.

118
Net retention, percent

Fleets add vans and depots faster than any churn takes away. It has been above 115 for eight quarters.

02

Slide 2 · intro · The thesis in one paragraph: the company grew while burning less per dollar of new ARR every year.

Routeworks at 30 June 2030

Twelve months to 30 June 2030 unless stated. ARR is contracted monthly recurring revenue times twelve.

$48M

ARR

Up from 31 million dollars a year earlier, so 17 million net new.

118%

Net revenue retention

Revenue from fleets a year ago against what they pay now.

0.9

Burn multiple

Net burn of 15.3 million divided by 17 million net new ARR.

1,450

Fleets

Averaging 33,000 dollars a year each, up from 27,000 at the A.

77%

Gross margin

After hosting, map data and customer support.

26M

Deliveries a month

Routed across about 52,000 vans in three regions.

03

Slide 3 · metrics · Six headline metrics in a grid, each defined in the line underneath so nothing is a vanity number.

ARR BY REGION

Three regions, one product

Jun 27
Jun 28
Jun 29
Jun 30
015304560
ANZ
UK
North America

TOTAL ARR

$48M

Millions, at each 30 June

AUSTRALIA AND NZ

$22M

46 percent, the home market

UNITED KINGDOM

$13M

27 percent, entered in 2027

NORTH AMERICA

$13M

27 percent, entered in 2028

04

Slide 4 · metrics · ARR by region as stacked columns, showing the UK and North America catching up with the home market.

One hundred dollars of revenue

Per 100 dollars of revenue: hosting and map data, support, onboarding and account management leave 70.

Revenue
Hosting
Support
Onboarding
Accounts
Contribution
0255075100

05

Slide 5 · metrics · Contribution margin as a waterfall from 100 dollars of revenue, so the 70 percent is a sum of named costs.

EFFICIENCY

The burn multiple, year by year

Measure
FY28
FY29
FY30
ARR at 30 June
$16M
$31M
$48M
Net new ARR
$10M
$15M
$17M
Net burn
$16.0M
$18.0M
$15.3M
Burn multiple
1.6
1.2
0.9
Net revenue retention
112%
116%
118%
Gross margin
71%
74%
77%
Years to 30 June. Burn multiple is net burn divided by net new ARR in the same year. FY27 was 2.4.

06

Slide 6 · metrics · The burn multiple year by year in a scorecard, because a single good year is not a trend.

What changed since the B

The Series B in 2028 bought growth. This round buys four markets that each have to pay back on their own.

Lever
Series B plan
Series C plan
Market entry
Two at once
One at a time, gated
Sales motion
Field sales in every region
Partners first, field sales after 50 fleets
Gate to the next market
None
Payback under 30 months
Target burn multiple
Under 2.0
Under 1.0
Product spend
45 percent of the round
28 percent of the round
Series B figures are from the 2028 plan as presented to investors.

07

Slide 7 · comparison · How the Series B plan and the Series C plan differ, line by line, to show the company changed how it spends.

EXPANSION

Four markets, priced

Market
Fleets we can sell to
Entry cost
Payback
Canada
2,100
$4.0M
18 months
Netherlands
1,300
$3.5M
22 months
Germany
4,600
$7.0M
26 months
Japan
5,200
$8.5M
34 months
Payback is entry cost divided by monthly contribution at the fleet count we reach in year two. Entry costs total 23 million dollars.

08

Slide 8 · metrics · The four expansion markets in one table with entry cost and payback, which is what the round is mostly for.

How a market is entered

The five steps that took the UK and North America from zero to 13 million dollars each.

1

Map data

Licence local road and address data and benchmark it against 10,000 real drops.
2

Partner

Sign one telematics partner whose fleets can switch Routeworks on from their dashboard.
3

First 50 fleets

Sell through the partner with a local lead and two engineers only.
4

Gate review

Board checks payback is tracking under 30 months before field sales are hired.
5

Scale

Field sales and a support desk in the local time zone.

No step five without passing step four

The Netherlands entry is held until Canada passes its gate

09

Slide 9 · process · The entry playbook in five steps, since repeatable entry is what makes the market table credible.

One market at a time

Each market opens only after the previous one passes its payback gate at the board.

Q1 2031

Canada

Map data licensed in Q4 2030. Shared partner with our North American fleets.

Q3 2031

Netherlands

Opens if Canada passes its gate. A dense, cycle heavy delivery market close to the UK team.

Q2 2032

Germany

The largest European market. Entered from the Netherlands with a German partner.

Q1 2033

Japan

Highest cost and longest payback, so last. Needs Japanese address data built in 2032.

10

Slide 10 · timeline · The order the four markets open in, with each one gated on the one before.

THE ASK

Series C, sixty million dollars

$60M

Sized to 100 million of ARR by 2033

Use
Amount
Share
What it buys
Four market entries
$23M
38%
Canada, Netherlands, Germany, Japan
Product
$17M
28%
Multi depot planning, electric van range
Enterprise sales
$12M
20%
Fleets over 500 vans in existing markets
Reserve
$8M
14%
Held against a missed gate
Total
$60M
100%
About four years at the current burn
Shares are rounded. The market line matches the four entry costs on slide eight; the reserve is drawn only if a market misses its gate.

11

Slide 11 · investment · Sixty million dollars by use in a table, with the four markets as one line totalling the entry costs.

ROUTEWORKS

Growth that pays for itself.

The data room holds monthly ARR by fleet since 2027, the cohort retention file and the payback model for each of the four markets. Access opens after a first meeting.

Ivan Kraljevic · ivan@routeworks.example

12

Slide 12 · closing · Close on diligence access, which is what a late stage investor wants after the meeting.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
A formal cover with the efficiency claim, since a Series C is priced on how growth is bought.
Slide 2intro
The thesis in one paragraph: the company grew while burning less per dollar of new ARR every year.
Slide 3metrics
Six headline metrics in a grid, each defined in the line underneath so nothing is a vanity number.
Slide 4metrics
ARR by region as stacked columns, showing the UK and North America catching up with the home market.
Slide 5metrics
Contribution margin as a waterfall from 100 dollars of revenue, so the 70 percent is a sum of named costs.
Slide 6metrics
The burn multiple year by year in a scorecard, because a single good year is not a trend.
Slide 7comparison
How the Series B plan and the Series C plan differ, line by line, to show the company changed how it spends.
Slide 8metrics
The four expansion markets in one table with entry cost and payback, which is what the round is mostly for.
Slide 9process
The entry playbook in five steps, since repeatable entry is what makes the market table credible.
Slide 10timeline
The order the four markets open in, with each one gated on the one before.
Slide 11investment
Sixty million dollars by use in a table, with the four markets as one line totalling the entry costs.
Slide 12closing
Close on diligence access, which is what a late stage investor wants after the meeting.

Slide by slide

Slide one is the name and the efficiency claim. Slide two is the thesis, with the burn multiple and net retention as two cards. Slide three is six headline metrics, each defined. Slide four stacks ARR by region. Slide five walks 100 dollars of revenue to 70 dollars of contribution. Slide six is the burn multiple year by year. Slide seven compares the Series B plan with this one. Slide eight prices four markets. Slide nine is the five step entry playbook with a payback gate. Slide ten orders the markets in time. Slide eleven is the 60 million dollar use of funds. Slide twelve offers data room access.

How to adapt this deck

A Series C funding an acquisition rather than new markets should replace slides eight to ten with the target, the price and the combined numbers, and keep the efficiency slides as proof the company can absorb it. A consumer company should swap net revenue retention for cohort revenue curves and the burn multiple for payback on acquisition spend. A company whose burn multiple is getting worse should not hide it: show the trend and the specific line that will bring it down.

What late stage investors ask for

David Sacks popularised the burn multiple as net burn divided by net new ARR, and Bessemer Venture Partners publishes the cloud benchmarks most late stage investors compare retention and efficiency against. By Series C the question is no longer whether the product works but what each additional dollar of capital produces. That is why this deck spends three slides on efficiency and ends the market plan with a payback gate the board enforces, rather than a target the company hopes to hit.

What makes this deck work

Efficiency is a trend, not a number

Slide six shows the burn multiple at 1.6, 1.2 and 0.9 across three financial years, with net new ARR and net burn in the rows above. The 0.9 on the cover is 15.3 million dollars of burn over 17 million of net new ARR, and the table proves it.

Every expansion market is priced

Slide eight gives Canada, the Netherlands, Germany and Japan an entry cost and a payback, totalling 23 million dollars. The use of funds on slide eleven carries the same 23 million as one line, so the round is built from the market plan.

The region chart shows where growth comes from

Slide four stacks ARR by region from 6 million in June 2027 to 48 million in June 2030. The United Kingdom and North America each reach 13 million, which tells an investor the entry playbook has already worked twice.

Questions people ask

What is a burn multiple and why does it matter at Series C?

Net burn divided by net new ARR in the same period. A multiple of 1 means each dollar burned added a dollar of recurring revenue. At Series C investors use it to judge whether more capital will be spent well, so show it over several years, not one.

How is a Series C deck different from a Series B deck?

A Series B deck proves the model repeats; a Series C deck proves it repeats efficiently and shows where the next large market is. Expect more slides on unit economics, retention and capital allocation, and fewer on the problem and the product.

How do I show ARR by region in a pitch deck?

As stacked columns at the same date each year, with the total and each region share listed beside the chart. Four points is enough. The region slide here uses each 30 June so the columns line up with the financial years in the efficiency table.

Should a late stage deck include a contribution margin waterfall?

Yes, if margin is part of the efficiency story. A waterfall from 100 dollars of revenue to contribution makes each cost visible. This example deducts hosting and map data, then support, to reach the 77 percent gross margin, then onboarding and account management to reach 70 dollars.

How many slides should a Series C deck have?

Twelve to fifteen for the main deck, with a longer appendix for diligence. This one has twelve, and every one carries a number. Generating a deck this long needs a paid plan, which allows up to 20 slides per generation; the free plan stops at six.

Do the tables export to PowerPoint as real tables?

In the editable PowerPoint export, yes: tables, text, lists and nine of the ten chart kinds become native PowerPoint objects, so an analyst can rework the market table. The waterfall chart is one of the kinds that exports as a native chart.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a pitch presentation with AI, then Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .