Merrowby Health District 2028 scorecard
Balanced scorecard perspectives slide with a measure and target in each
A balanced scorecard perspectives slide shows four views of one strategy, each with the objective, the measure that tracks it and the target it must reach. This one sets the 2028 scorecard for Merrowby Health District, a fictional public health service.
What is on the slide
- Title
- Scorecard, Merrowby Health. Read it bottom up: trained, retained staff speed discharge, which cuts waits and holds the cost per bed day.
- Financial, Cost per bed day
- Hold cost per bed day at $1,420 and cut agency staff spend from $9.8M to $6.5M by June 2028.
- Customer, Patient rating
- Lift patients rating care good or very good from 84% to 90%, and cut emergency waits over 4 hours to 25%.
- Internal Process, Discharge by 11am
- Discharge 45% of patients before 11am, up from 28%, and cut readmissions within 28 days to 6%.
- Learning and Growth, First year retention
- Keep 88% of new nurses past their first year and train 120 staff on the new patient record system.
When this is the right slide
Choose this slide when a leadership team is setting a strategy and must agree one measure and one dated target for each of the four perspectives, with the cause chain between them stated.
What to swap it for
Grouping: Gap Analysis. Swap to the gap analysis when the board needs current and target scores compared on one scale, rather than four perspectives with a measure each.
What this slide shows
A title reads Scorecard, Merrowby Health, with a framing line: read it bottom up, trained and retained staff speed discharge, which cuts waits and holds the cost per bed day. Four cards sit in a two by two grid, each with an icon badge, the perspective name, a small measure tag and one sentence. Financial, with a line chart icon and the tag Cost per bed day: hold cost per bed day at $1,420 and cut agency staff spend from $9.8M to $6.5M by June 2028. Customer, with a people icon and the tag Patient rating: lift patients rating care good or very good from 84% to 90%, and cut emergency waits over 4 hours to 25%. Internal Process, with a gear icon and the tag Discharge by 11am: discharge 45% of patients before 11am, up from 28%, and cut readmissions within 28 days to 6%. Learning and Growth, with a graduation cap and the tag First year retention: keep 88% of new nurses past their first year and train 120 staff on the new patient record system.
When this is the right slide
Use it when a strategy is being set or reset and the leadership team needs to agree, on one page, how success will be measured across money, the people served, the way work is done and the capability behind it. It suits public services, health and education providers and any organisation where financial results alone would distort priorities. It is the wrong slide for tracking progress month to month, where a table of current values against targets serves better. It is also the wrong slide when the organisation has not agreed its strategy, because a scorecard measures a plan; without one, the four cards become a list of things that would be nice to improve. When the perspectives need more room for several objectives each, the pillars version gives each one a full column.
How to adapt it
First, choose one headline measure per perspective and write it in the tag, then write the objective sentence with both the baseline and the target. If a perspective has no measure the team can collect today, that is a finding to raise, not a gap to fill with a vague word such as engagement. Second, check that the targets are consistent with each other: discharging earlier should help emergency waits and agency spend, and the figures should not ask for opposite things. Third, write the causal chain in the framing line, bottom up, so that the order of the conversation follows the logic rather than the grid. For a commercial business, replace patient rating with a customer retention rate and cost per bed day with operating margin; the structure and the discipline of baseline plus target stay the same. Date every target, and keep the same four measures at each review so movement can be compared.
What makes this slide work
Each perspective has a named measure
Cost per bed day, Patient rating, Discharge by 11am, First year retention. The small tag above each sentence names the one measure the perspective is judged on. That keeps the scorecard honest: an objective with no measure attached would be visible at once as the empty tag, and it would not survive the meeting.
Targets are written with their baselines
Agency spend from $9.8M to $6.5M. Patient rating from 84% to 90%. Discharge before 11am up from 28% to 45%. Every target carries its starting point, so the size of the commitment is visible. A target of 90% means little on its own; from 84% it is a six point lift the room can judge as ambitious or timid.
The framing line states the cause chain
Read it bottom up: trained, retained staff speed discharge, which cuts waits and holds the cost per bed day. One sentence connects the four perspectives in the order they influence each other. It answers the first question any experienced board member asks of a scorecard, which is how these measures relate to one another.
Questions people ask
How many measures should each perspective carry on the slide?
One headline measure, named in a short tag, with one or two objectives written as a sentence that includes the target. A full scorecard may track four or five measures per perspective, but the slide is a summary. Put the complete measure list, owners and data sources in the appendix table, and keep the slide to what the board will remember.
How do the four perspectives link to each other?
They form a chain of cause and effect read from the bottom up. Learning and growth enables better internal processes, better processes improve what customers experience, and that experience drives the financial result. The framing line on this slide states the chain in one sentence so the four cards read as one strategy rather than four separate wish lists.
How is this different from a balanced scorecard drawn as pillars?
A pillars layout gives each perspective a column and suits a scorecard that is mostly a list of objectives. This two by two version gives each perspective a measure tag above its sentence, which suits a scorecard where the measures are the point. The pillars example on this site shows the other approach for the same framework.
When should a scorecard be split across slides?
When the audience will discuss progress rather than approve targets. A progress review needs current values, trend arrows and a status for each measure, which is a table or a dashboard, not four cards. Use this slide to set the scorecard once, then a tracking slide at each review that shows how each measure has moved since.
What chart fits a balanced scorecard?
A small line chart per measure, showing the baseline, the latest value and the target line, works well on a follow up slide. A single combined chart does not, because the measures have different units: dollars, percentages and headcounts. Keep each chart to one measure so the target line is never on a misleading shared axis.
How should a balanced scorecard slide be presented?
Present it bottom up, following the causal chain: training and retention first, then discharge times, then patient experience, then cost. That order explains why the targets fit together. Presenting financial first, as the grid's reading order suggests, makes the other three perspectives sound like means to a budget rather than a strategy for better care.
Build your own in about a minute
The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.
Make one like thisOther slide examples
OKR slide example with two objectives and measurable results
An OKR slide only works when each key result carries a baseline, a target and a name, because a result without those three is a wish with a number attached. This one sets a quarter for Fieldnote, a fictional farm record keeping app.
SWOT slide example filled with checkable points
A SWOT slide is only worth showing when every line can be checked against a record, because adjectives fill the grid without changing a decision. This one belongs to Harbour Bike Hire, a fictional operator going into a summer season.
Five whys slide that ends at a fixable cause
A five whys slide is worth showing when the last answer names something the organisation can change this week, not a general condition it has to live with. This one walks back a missed pay run at Pulse Payroll, a fictional bureau.
Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides, then Style text and add callouts, stats and lists. For everything this generator can do, see the slide maker.
Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .