Harbour Bike Hire summer position
SWOT slide example filled with checkable points
A SWOT slide is only worth showing when every line can be checked against a record, because adjectives fill the grid without changing a decision. This one belongs to Harbour Bike Hire, a fictional operator going into a summer season.
What is on the slide
- Strengths
- 14 of 18 docks on the foreshore. Fleet age 2.1 years. 4.7 stars over 1,900 rides. Repairs turned around in 26 hours.
- Weaknesses
- 62% of revenue in four months. 310 helmets lost a year. No wet weather offer at all. Two staff hold every van key.
- Opportunities
- Ferry terminal tender closes June 2027. Council e-bike grant, $180,000. Hotel partners, 1,100 rooms. Winter school programme, 26 weeks.
- Threats
- Scooter operator licensed March 2027. Foreshore works close 3 docks in 2028. Insurance renewal up 19%. Battery lead time 22 weeks.
- Axis labels
- Helpful and harmful run across the top as the effect on the plan; internal and external run down the side as the origin, which is what makes the four quadrants mean something.
When this is the right slide
A four quadrant SWOT suits a planning session where the internal position and the external environment both matter, and every quadrant can be filled with facts rather than with opinions.
What to swap it for
Pillars: SWOT Colored Quadrants. Swap to the coloured quadrant version when the four cells need to be distinguished by colour, such as a printed workshop handout that will be annotated by several groups.
What this slide shows
A title reads SWOT, Harbour Bike Hire, with a framing line saying this is the position going into the 2027 summer, written so every line can be checked against a record. Below sits a four quadrant grid with the canonical labels baked in. Strengths, top left: 14 of 18 docks on the foreshore; fleet age 2.1 years; 4.7 stars over 1,900 rides; repairs turned around in 26 hours. Weaknesses, top right: 62% of revenue in four months; 310 helmets lost a year; no wet weather offer at all; two staff hold every van key. Opportunities, bottom left: ferry terminal tender closes June 2027; council e-bike grant, $180,000; hotel partners, 1,100 rooms; winter school programme, 26 weeks. Threats, bottom right: scooter operator licensed March 2027; foreshore works close 3 docks in 2028; insurance renewal up 19%; battery lead time 22 weeks. Axis labels run outside the grid: helpful to harmful across the top, internal to external down the side.
When this is the right slide
Use it at the start of a planning cycle, when a board or a management team needs a shared picture of where the business stands before it argues about what to do. It also works in a readiness review before a launch, in a competitive posture summary and as the opening of an annual plan. The four cell shape is familiar enough that nobody has to be taught how to read it, which is most of its value in a mixed room. It is the wrong slide when the answer is already known and the SWOT is being assembled to justify it, because a grid built backwards from a conclusion is obvious to everybody except its author. It is also wrong as a standing item: a SWOT repeated quarterly with the same sixteen lines has stopped being analysis and become a ritual.
How to adapt it
First, set a rule before filling the grid: every line carries a number, a date or a count. That single constraint removes most of what makes SWOT slides useless, because vague lines cannot survive it. Where no figure exists, the honest move is to leave the cell with three points rather than to pad it with a fourth. Second, check each item against both axes before placing it. Insurance renewal up 19 percent is external and harmful, so it is a threat; two staff holding every van key is internal and harmful, so it is a weakness. Items that seem to fit two cells usually turn out to be two different items. Third, pair the slide with the thing that follows it. A SWOT on its own ends a meeting with a picture and no work, so the next slide should convert the four cells into a handful of dated actions with owners, or into a prioritisation matrix where each item is scored on effort and impact.
What makes this slide work
Fifteen of the sixteen points carry a figure or a date
14 of 18 docks, fleet age 2.1 years, insurance up 19 percent, battery lead time 22 weeks. The one exception is no wet weather offer at all, which states an absence rather than a measure. That makes each line arguable in a useful way, because the disagreement becomes about the number rather than about whether the business is strong, and a point that turns out to be wrong can be corrected from a record.
The axes are labelled, so the quadrants are not arbitrary
Helpful and harmful across the top, internal and external down the side. Those two axes are what separate a strength from an opportunity, and most filled SWOT slides leave them implicit, which is why items drift between cells. With the labels present, a reader can check that a $180,000 grant really is external and really is helpful.
The weaknesses are specific enough to act on
62 percent of revenue in four months, 310 helmets lost a year and two staff holding every van key are three different kinds of exposure: seasonality, leakage and key person risk. Each one implies a piece of work. A weaknesses cell full of phrases like limited brand awareness gives the meeting nothing to schedule.
Questions people ask
How many points should each SWOT quadrant carry?
Three or four, and this layout takes four. More than that and the type shrinks below what a room can read, and the audience stops distinguishing between the important lines and the filler. If a quadrant genuinely has eight points, pick the four that would change a decision and keep the rest in the written analysis.
What makes a SWOT slide weak?
Adjectives instead of facts. Strong brand, limited resources and growing market could describe almost any organisation, so a grid of them tells a board nothing and cannot be checked afterwards. The second failure is mixing internal and external items, which usually shows up as opportunities that are really plans the business has already decided to run.
What is the difference between a weakness and a threat?
Origin. A weakness is inside the organisation and can be fixed by it; a threat is outside and can only be prepared for. Two staff holding every van key is a weakness because the business controls who holds keys. A competitor being licensed is a threat because no amount of internal work removes it.
Should a SWOT slide use colour to separate the quadrants?
Only if colour carries meaning the labels do not. The quadrant names already separate the cells, and four strong colours can imply a ranking that is not intended. Colour is more useful on a printed workshop handout, where groups annotate cells and need to find their section quickly across a table.
Should the SWOT grid show the helpful and internal axes?
Yes, when the audience will argue about where an item belongs. This layout prints helpful and harmful across the top and internal and external down the side, so a reader can test the council e-bike grant against both axes and see why it is an opportunity rather than a strength. Without the axes, items drift between cells and the grid stops meaning anything.
How should a SWOT slide be presented out loud?
Do not read the sixteen lines. Name the one item in each quadrant that changes what the organisation should do next, and say why. The grid is there so the room can check the rest at its own pace. Finish by asking which quadrant the audience thinks is missing something, which is the only question that improves a SWOT.
Build your own in about a minute
The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.
Make one like thisOther slide examples
OKR slide example with two objectives and measurable results
An OKR slide only works when each key result carries a baseline, a target and a name, because a result without those three is a wish with a number attached. This one sets a quarter for Fieldnote, a fictional farm record keeping app.
3C analysis slide with three facts in every corner
A 3C analysis slide is useful when each corner holds facts the room can test, so the strategy that follows is visibly built on them. This one prepares Solvane Translation, a fictional agency, for its move into legal translation in 2027.
Roles and responsibilities slide with decision rights in every row
A roles and responsibilities slide prevents the two most common program failures, work nobody owns and decisions everybody thinks are theirs, by putting each role and its decision rights in one row. This one sets out the Bellinvale Flood Recovery Program, a fictional 18 month, $14.2M recovery effort.
Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides, then Style text and add callouts, stats and lists. For everything this generator can do, see the slide maker.
Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .