Urban canopy and street heat study
Research presentation cover slide with authors and affiliation
A research presentation cover has to carry the authors and the affiliation, because the room is judging the work partly by who did it and where. This one opens a fictional study of street tree canopy and surface heat presented at an urban climate conference.
What is on the slide
- Eyebrow
- URBAN HEAT STUDY 2027 in small uppercase over a hairline that runs across the top.
- Title
- Canopy Cover And Street Heat, set across two editorial lines under a short brand rule.
- Method in one sentence
- Surface temperature on 148 streets across two summers, set against canopy cover measured from aerial imagery.
- Byline
- Okonjo, Halvorsen and Ruiz, with WESTPORT INSTITUTE and URBAN CLIMATE CONGRESS in uppercase underneath.
When this is the right slide
An editorial cover with a side image suits a research talk where the title, the authors and the institution all have to be legible in one look and the subject has a photograph that is not a chart.
What to swap it for
Cover: Portrait + Title Panel. Swap to the portrait panel cover for a single presenter, where a face beside the title is more useful than a subject photograph and there is no author list to carry.
What this slide shows
A hairline runs across the top of the slide with a small uppercase eyebrow beneath it reading URBAN HEAT STUDY 2027. Below that sits a short brand rule and then the title across two editorial lines: Canopy Cover And Street Heat. Under the title, a two line sub headline gives the method in one sentence: surface temperature on 148 streets across two summers, set against canopy cover measured from aerial imagery. At the foot of the text column, the byline reads Okonjo, Halvorsen and Ruiz, with WESTPORT INSTITUTE and URBAN CLIMATE CONGRESS in small uppercase beneath it. A full height photograph bleeds off the right edge of the slide: an avenue of mature street trees in autumn colour, with a weathered steel sculpture in the foreground and a paved path running between them. The layout has no slot for funding acknowledgement or an ethics number, so those belong on a later slide.
When this is the right slide
Use it for a conference talk, a thesis defence, a seminar or a research briefing where the work has more than one author. The two things this cover does that a plain title slide does not are carrying an author list without crowding and giving the subject a photograph large enough to set the scene. That is valuable for field based research, where an image of the study environment tells a specialist audience more than a title can. It is the wrong slide when the only honest image is a figure from the results, because putting a finding on the cover spoils the structure of the talk. It is also the wrong slide for a single presenter with no co authors, where a portrait cover makes better use of the same space.
How to adapt it
First, take the author order from the paper and do not change it for the slide. If the presenter is not the first author, say so out loud rather than reordering the line, and keep the same order on every slide that repeats the names. Second, write the sub headline as a method sentence with a number in it. The sample size, the period and the measure are what a specialist audience uses to size the work, and they are more useful on a cover than a statement of significance. Third, choose an image of the study environment rather than of the researchers or the equipment. Street trees for a canopy study, a ward for a clinical study, a reach of river for a water study. If the field has no photographable environment, drop the image and use a typographic cover, because an abstract stock picture on a research cover reads as filler to exactly the audience that matters.
What makes this slide work
The authors are listed in one line, in order
Okonjo, Halvorsen and Ruiz appear as a byline rather than as a stack of names with roles. Author order carries meaning in research, and a cover that reorders names to fit the layout or promotes the presenter above the first author creates a problem that no amount of verbal correction fixes. One line, in the order agreed for the paper, is the safe form.
The method sentence says what was measured and how much
Surface temperature on 148 streets across two summers, set against canopy cover measured from aerial imagery. A specialist audience can judge the scale of the study from that alone, which is what they will do in the first ten seconds regardless of what the slide says. Giving them the sample and the period immediately buys attention for the findings.
The institution and the venue sit together
WESTPORT INSTITUTE and URBAN CLIMATE CONGRESS are on the same uppercase line under the authors. The affiliation tells the room where the work was done, and the conference name dates the talk once the deck is shared, which matters for a study that will be cited by people who were not in the session.
Questions people ask
How should authors be listed on a research cover slide?
In the order used on the paper, on one line, with the institution underneath. Roles and contributions belong in an acknowledgement slide or the paper itself. Changing the order to put the presenter first is the most common mistake, and it creates a discrepancy between the talk and the published record that somebody in the room will notice.
Should the affiliation appear for every author?
Only when they differ, and then the cover is usually the wrong place for it. A single shared institution fits on one line. For a collaboration across three universities, use superscript markers and a small affiliation block on the second slide, which keeps the cover readable from the back of a lecture theatre.
Does the conference name belong on the slide?
Yes, with the year. It dates the talk for anyone who receives the deck later, and it tells a room with parallel sessions that they are in the right place. It is also the detail most often missing when a slide deck is uploaded to a repository, where a reader has no other way to tell which version of the work they have.
What about funding and ethics approval?
They belong on a later slide, usually the acknowledgements at the end or a methods slide near the start, depending on the field's convention. A cover that carries a grant number and an ethics reference alongside the title and authors runs out of room, and neither line is what the audience needs in the first ten seconds.
How much should a research cover say about the method?
One sentence with the sample and the period in it. Surface temperature on 148 streets across two summers is enough for a specialist to judge the scale of the work. The design detail, the instruments and the statistical approach all belong on the methods slide, where there is room to be precise and time to answer questions.
How should a research cover be presented out loud?
Give the title, name the co authors and the institution, then state the question the study set out to answer. That last part is not on the slide, which is deliberate: the cover carries what has to be read, and the speaker carries what has to be heard. Reading the method sentence aloud duplicates what the room has already taken in.
Build your own in about a minute
The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.
Make one like thisOther slide examples
Keynote title slide example built on a single word
A keynote title slide is read by a room that has just sat down, so one word holds better than a full sentence. This one opens a fictional conference talk called Slower, given by a logistics planner at a freight industry week.
Bold cover slide example with a neobrutalist offset shadow
A loud cover fits when the audience chose to be there and the tone of the deck is the point, not the formality. This one opens a community meetup talk from Trail, a fictional walking app, given in Hobart.
Annual report cover slide with the period, author and version
An annual report cover has to date itself, because the same deck is read months later by people who were not in the room. This one belongs to Southern Rivers Landcare, a fictional catchment group reporting on the year to 30 June 2025.
Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides, then Present your slides with speaker notes and a pen. For everything this generator can do, see the slide maker.
Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .