Unit plan, Year 9 history, The Industrial Revolution

Unit plan template with weekly sequence and assessment map

A unit plan has to show how several weeks of lessons build towards a set of outcomes, when and how each outcome is assessed, and what resources and adjustments the teaching team needs. This three page plan for a six week year 9 history unit on the Industrial Revolution does that with five outcomes, a weekly sequence, an assessment map weighted to 100%, a resource list and adjustments for four groups.

Create a document with OneCraft3 A4 pages, editable, then download as a PDF

The document, page by page

Every page as it renders and as it prints, with nothing summarised. Read the wording before you reuse it.

Ashcombe Park College, humanities faculty. Year 9 history unit plan, Term 2Page 1 of 3
Ashcombe Park College, humanities faculty. Year 9 history unit plan, Term 2Page 2 of 3
Ashcombe Park College, humanities faculty. Year 9 history unit plan, Term 2Page 3 of 3
The Industrial Revolution: how work changed lives, 1750 to 1900
Year 9
Year level
6 weeks
Length
18 x 50 min
Lessons
9A, 9B, 9D
Classes

Students investigate how new machines, factories and railways changed where and how ordinary people lived and worked between 1750 and 1900, and who gained and who lost. The unit is built around one inquiry question, and every week adds evidence to answer it.

Inquiry question: Was the Industrial Revolution progress for the people who lived through it?
1. Outcomes

By the end of the unit, students will be able to:

1.
Explain the main technological and economic changes of the period, and sequence them on a timeline.
2.
Describe the experiences of different groups: factory children, women workers, mill owners, rural labourers.
3.
Analyse primary sources for origin, purpose and reliability, including a parliamentary report and a factory owner's letter.
4.
Explain the causes and effects of reform, such as limits on child labour and the growth of trade unions.
5.
Construct an evidence based argument in a structured extended response.
2. Weekly sequence
Week
Focus
Key learning and activities
Evidence collected
1
Before the factories
Rural life and cottage industry; class timeline 1750 to 1900; inquiry question introduced
Timeline, first answer to the question
2
Machines and mills
Spinning jenny to steam power; source analysis of a mill floor illustration
Source analysis sheet 1
3
Life in the factory towns
Housing, sanitation, working hours; a parliamentary report on child labour
Source analysis task, assessed
4
Railways and the wider world
Speed of travel and trade; raw materials from colonies; who benefited
Cause and effect diagram
5
Reform and resistance
Factory laws, unions and protest; role play of a reform debate
Debate notes, peer feedback
6
Was it progress?
Plan, draft and write the extended response in class; reflection
Extended response, assessed
Week
Focus
Key learning and activities
Evidence collected
1
Before the factories
Rural life and cottage industry; class timeline 1750 to 1900; inquiry question introduced
Timeline, first answer to the question
2
Machines and mills
Spinning jenny to steam power; source analysis of a mill floor illustration
Source analysis sheet 1
3
Life in the factory towns
Housing, sanitation, working hours; a parliamentary report on child labour
Source analysis task, assessed
4
Railways and the wider world
Speed of travel and trade; raw materials from colonies; who benefited
Cause and effect diagram
5
Reform and resistance
Factory laws, unions and protest; role play of a reform debate
Debate notes, peer feedback
6
Was it progress?
Plan, draft and write the extended response in class; reflection
Extended response, assessed
Week
Focus
Key learning and activities
Evidence collected
1
Before the factories
Rural life and cottage industry; class timeline 1750 to 1900; inquiry question introduced
Timeline, first answer to the question
2
Machines and mills
Spinning jenny to steam power; source analysis of a mill floor illustration
Source analysis sheet 1
3
Life in the factory towns
Housing, sanitation, working hours; a parliamentary report on child labour
Source analysis task, assessed
4
Railways and the wider world
Speed of travel and trade; raw materials from colonies; who benefited
Cause and effect diagram
5
Reform and resistance
Factory laws, unions and protest; role play of a reform debate
Debate notes, peer feedback
6
Was it progress?
Plan, draft and write the extended response in class; reflection
Extended response, assessed

Each week has three lessons: one to build knowledge, one to work with sources and one to apply the learning to the inquiry question. The class timeline stays on the wall for the whole unit and grows each week.

3. Assessment map
Task
Week
Type
Weight
Outcomes assessed
Source analysis: the child labour report
3
In class, 50 minutes
30%
2, 3
Extended response: Was it progress?
6
In class, two lessons
50%
1, 2, 4, 5
Unit knowledge quiz
5
Online, 20 minutes
20%
1, 4
Total
100%
Formative checks every week
Exit tickets, timeline entries and source sheets are checked, not graded, and feed back into the next lesson.
Marking
Both assessed tasks use the faculty rubric with four criteria: knowledge, use of sources, argument and communication. Teachers moderate five samples from each class together in week 7.
Feedback
Written feedback on the source analysis is returned in week 4, so students can use it in the extended response.
4. Resources
Resource
Use
Weeks
Class textbook, chapter 6
Background reading and key terms
1 to 5
Source pack: 12 primary sources
Reports, letters, illustrations, a wage table
2 to 6
Documentary extract, 18 minutes
Life in a mill town
3
Online museum collection of factory objects
Object study in pairs
2
Faculty rubric and model answers
Shared before each assessed task
3, 6
Role cards for the reform debate
Mill owner, worker, reformer, magistrate
5
5. Adjustments

Adjustments are planned for groups, then confirmed for individual students from their learning plans before the unit starts.

Learners
Adjustments
Students learning English
Glossary of 20 key terms with images; sentence starters for source analysis; sources with simplified language alongside the original
Students needing literacy support
Shorter source extracts, a paragraph scaffold for the extended response, extra time on assessed tasks per their plans
Students working beyond the level
A second inquiry question comparing two cities; an extra source on colonial raw materials to judge
Students absent for an assessed task
Alternative task of equal difficulty within one week

After the unit, the teaching team reviews results by criterion and records what to change next year. A note on which sources worked and which did not is kept with the source pack.

Section by section

What each section is for, so you can keep the ones you need and drop the rest.

Unit overview
Year, length, lessons and classes, and the inquiry question.
1. Outcomes
Five outcomes students will reach by the end.
2. Weekly sequence
Six weeks with focus, key learning and evidence collected.
3. Assessment map
Three tasks weighted to 100%, formative checks, marking and feedback.
4. Resources
Six resources with their use and the weeks they are needed.
5. Adjustments
Planned adjustments for four groups of learners and the unit review.

How to adapt this document

First, write the inquiry question and the final task before the weekly sequence, then make each week supply evidence for that task. Second, swap the history content for your subject but keep the evidence column, which turns a topic list into a build up. Third, check the assessment map against your outcomes before teaching starts; an outcome no task assesses is one students will treat as optional.

What makes this document work

One question runs through every week

The unit is built on a single inquiry question, "Was the Industrial Revolution progress for the people who lived through it?", introduced in week 1 and answered in the extended response in week 6. Each week's evidence column adds something students will use in that final answer.

The assessment map covers every outcome

Three assessed tasks weigh 30%, 50% and 20%, adding to 100%, and the outcomes column shows all five outcomes are assessed at least once. Feedback on the week 3 source analysis returns in week 4, in time for students to use it in the extended response.

Adjustments are planned for groups first

Four groups have named adjustments, from a 20 term glossary with images for students learning English to an extra source and a second inquiry question for those working beyond the level. Individual plans then confirm them before the unit starts, rather than adjustments being improvised mid task.

Questions people ask

What is the difference between a unit plan and a lesson plan?

A unit plan covers a sequence of lessons over several weeks: the outcomes, the order of learning, the assessment and the resources. A lesson plan covers one lesson in detail, minute by minute. Teachers usually write the unit plan first, so each lesson plan knows what it is building towards and where assessment falls.

What is an assessment map?

An assessment map lists every assessed task in a unit with when it happens, its type, its weighting and which outcomes it assesses. It shows at a glance whether every outcome is covered and whether assessment is spread sensibly, rather than bunched in the last week. It also helps teachers plan feedback between tasks.

Why build a unit around an inquiry question?

An inquiry question gives students a reason to gather knowledge and evidence week by week, because they know they will have to answer it. It turns a list of topics into an argument. A good question has more than one defensible answer, such as whether industrialisation was progress, so students must weigh evidence rather than recall facts.

How many lessons should a unit plan cover?

Most units run four to ten weeks, often 12 to 30 lessons depending on how many times a week the subject is taught. Six weeks of three lessons, as here, suits a focused history unit with two assessed tasks. Longer units benefit from a midpoint check so the plan can be adjusted before the final assessment.

How do you plan adjustments in a unit plan?

Plan for groups first, such as students learning English or students needing literacy support, with adjustments that apply across the whole unit, like a glossary or a paragraph scaffold. Then confirm individual adjustments from each student's learning plan before teaching starts. Planning ahead means support is ready on the day of an assessed task rather than improvised.

How should a teaching team review a unit after teaching it?

Look at results by assessment criterion rather than overall grades, note which lessons, sources or tasks worked and which did not, and record changes for next time where the next teacher will find them. Moderating samples together, as this team does in week 7, also keeps marking consistent across classes.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other document examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Create a document with AI, then Document builder components. For everything this generator can do, see the document maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .