Encorefold Series A
Creator platform pitch deck with payouts and take rate first
A creator platform is judged on what the creators were paid, and any deck that reports its own revenue first has answered a different question. Encorefold is invented, and its ten slides open on 6.4 million dollars paid to musicians and treat the 8 percent as a consequence of it.
Every slide, in order
The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.
The structure
What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.
- Slide 1cover
- Lead with what creators were paid, not with what the platform kept.
- Slide 2intro
- Why a working musician needs this, argued from what streaming pays rather than from creator economy language.
- Slide 3pillars
- Four things built for musicians rather than for creators in general.
- Slide 4metrics
- Payouts, take rate and creator count on one row, in that order, because the order is the argument.
- Slide 5metrics
- Gross payments split by membership tier, since the top tier is where the growth is coming from.
- Slide 6comparison
- The fee against two competing shapes, described by type rather than named, on one real payment.
- Slide 7process
- How a musician gets from signup to a first payment, with the drop at each step named.
- Slide 8pillars
- Why musicians stay, in five points, since churn at the creator level is the real risk in this model.
- Slide 9investment
- Seven million in four cards, weighted to the announce step the funnel slide identified.
- Slide 10closing
- Close on the payout number again, and offer the creator level data behind it.
Slide by slide
Slide one puts the payout and the take rate on the cover. Slide two contrasts streaming income with 200 paying fans. Slide three is four things built for musicians rather than for creators generally. Slide four is payouts, take rate and active creators in that order. Slide five is gross payments by membership tier as a stacked column. Slide six compares what a musician keeps on eight dollars across three platform shapes. Slide seven is the funnel from signup to a first paying member. Slide eight is five reasons creators stay, starting with being able to leave. Slide nine splits seven million four ways. Slide ten restates the payout and offers the creator level data.
How to adapt this deck
A platform for writers or video makers keeps the structure and replaces the four music specific features, because the whole argument rests on being built for one craft rather than for creators in general. A business taking no fee and charging a subscription to the creator instead swaps the take rate comparison for a payback slide, since the creator is now a customer rather than a partner. A marketplace where fans discover creators rather than bringing their own adds a demand slide after the funnel, because the activation problem moves from announcing to being found.
What this audience asks for
The Ivors Academy and the Musicians Union both publish work on what performers and songwriters actually earn from recorded music and from direct support, and both describe the same gap this deck opens on: streaming income at scale is smaller than a few hundred paying fans. That is why the argument here is arithmetic rather than aspiration, and why the deck reports a median creator rather than a top one. An investor who has looked at this category before will ask for the median first, and a deck that has already published it has removed the most common reason these conversations stall.
What makes this deck work
The payout is the headline, the take rate is the footnote
Slide four reports 6.4 million paid to musicians first, then 8 percent, then 3,100 creators, and the description reconciles all three to 6.96 million of gross payments. Leading with the platform own revenue in this category signals which side of the transaction you are on.
The fee comparison includes the option that beats it
Slide six prices an eight dollar membership on three shapes, and self hosting keeps 93 percent against this platform 92. The slide then prices the six to ten hours a month that difference costs. A comparison that lets a rival win one column is one a musician will actually read.
Being able to leave is listed as a retention feature
Slide eight opens its five reasons creators stay with one click member export and no notice period. In a category built on lock in, a platform that reports 1.9 percent monthly creator churn while making leaving easy is making a much stronger claim than the churn number alone.
Questions people ask
What goes in a creator platform pitch deck?
What creators earn today, what the product does for them specifically, payouts and take rate together, payments by tier, the fee compared with the alternatives, the activation funnel, why creators stay and the ask. This example uses ten slides and reports the median creator, not the top one.
Should I lead with payouts or with revenue?
Payouts. The platform revenue is a fixed percentage of it, so reporting payouts first gives both numbers at once and signals whose side the business is on. This deck says 6.4 million paid and 557,000 kept, which is the same sentence read twice.
What take rate is defensible for a creator platform?
Whatever you can hold while creators are free to leave. This example charges 8 percent with payment processing inside it, contracts a 90 day notice period before changing it, and offers one click member export, which is what makes the rate a commitment rather than a lever.
How do I show creator activation?
As a funnel with the step where people stop. This deck runs 100 signups down to 51 with a first paying member and 43 still active at 90 days, and names announcing as the step that decides it. A total creator count with no activation rate behind it is a vanity number.
How many slides for a creator economy raise?
Ten to twelve. This one is ten. Screenshot tours of the creator dashboard are the usual filler. The comparison of what a creator keeps on one payment is the slide that does the work, because it is the calculation every creator has already done.
What do investors ask about creator concentration?
What share of payouts the top creators carry. Answer it with the median rather than the mean, as this deck does with a median of 14 paying members and 1,450 dollars a year, and offer the creator level file including the musicians who left. Concentration hidden in an average gets found in diligence.
Build your own in about a minute
The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.
Make one like thisOther presentation examples
Beauty brand pitch deck example for a skincare line
A beauty investor has seen a hundred serums in a nice bottle and is looking for the one thing that is expensive to copy. Selvane is invented, and its ten slides put a registered clinical trial at the centre and cost it at 90 cents a bottle so the claim can be checked.
Fashion brand pitch deck example built on sell through
An apparel investor has one question and it is not about the brand, it is about the stock that did not sell. Harrow Drill Co is invented, and its ten slides answer with sell through by drop, an unbroken 58 percent margin and no discount cycle to explain away.
Pet startup pitch deck built around one household
A pet startup pitch deck has to prove that one household pays more each month than it costs to feed, deliver to and replace when it leaves. This example does it for Pawcel, an invented Sydney fresh dog food subscription, with 14,000 households at 88 dollars a month and every cost line shown.
Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a pitch presentation with AI, then Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.
Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .