Liftwright Series A

Fitness app pitch deck example with a churn curve

Every fitness app deck claims engagement, and every fitness investor has learned to ask for churn by cohort month instead. Liftwright is invented, and it puts 6 percent on the cover and then plots three cohorts so the effect of each retention feature can be seen separately.

Create a presentation with OneCraft10 slides, read in order

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

LIFTWRIGHT

Series A, June 2027

92,000 subscribers at 6 percent churn

A strength training app that writes the next session from the last one.

Dominic Ferreira

Co-founder and Chief Executive

Built in Manchester

Slide 1 · cover · Put the churn rate on the cover, because hiding it is what every fitness app does.

Not motivation

People are told they quit the gym because they lack discipline. What actually happens is that they run the same three sessions for nine weeks, stop getting stronger, get bored and leave. The programme was the problem, not the person.

Four reasons

The plan never moves

A printed twelve week programme has no idea what happened on Tuesday. If the sets felt easy or impossible, next week is the same either way.

Video is not coaching

A library of workout videos is a menu, not a plan. It leaves the hardest decision, which is what to do today, entirely with the person.

Progress stops quietly

Nobody notices the week the weight stopped going up. By the time they do, they have already missed four sessions and cancelled.

Nobody is watching

A trainer would see the stall in a fortnight and change the plan. A printed programme and a workout video library both see nothing at all.

02

Slide 2 · intro · Why fitness apps lose people, framed as a programming problem rather than a motivation problem.

THE PRODUCT

Three things

Every feature in Liftwright earns its place by what it does to month three churn, which is where a fitness app loses most of the people it will ever lose.

1
The next session is written

Loads, sets and reps come from last week actual performance. There is never a blank screen to fill in.

2
A deload before the stall

When the numbers flatten for two weeks the app drops the load itself, which is the single largest churn saver we have.

3
A training partner, not a feed

One other person on the same programme sees your sessions. No leaderboard, no followers, no public profile.

03

Slide 3 · pillars · The three retention features, each described by what it does to the churn curve.

WHERE LIFTWRIGHT IS

Three numbers

92,000

Subscribers

Paying at the end of June 2027, up from 41,000 twelve months earlier.

6%

Monthly churn

Blended across every cohort. It was 11 percent before the deload feature shipped.

$9.90

Monthly price

One price, one tier. Annual is 79 dollars and 30 percent of subscribers take it.

04

Slide 4 · metrics · Subscribers, churn and price in one row, since the three are the entire business model.

Churn by cohort month

Percent of the cohort cancelling in each month after signup.

M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
M7
0481216
Jan 2026, before deload
Sep 2026, deload shipped
Mar 2027, plus partner

What it says

Month three churn in the newest cohort, against 13 percent before deload

6%

Median months a subscriber stays, up from 9 in the January cohort

17

Of subscribers now have a training partner, which halves month one churn

44%

Month one churn, the worst month and the one no feature has moved

10%

05

Slide 5 · metrics · Churn by cohort month for three cohorts, so the effect of the deload feature is visible rather than claimed.

What it replaces

A personal trainer writing a programme, against the app doing it. Both prices in US dollars, at what a city gym trainer typically charges.

A trainer

Liftwright

$58 a session

One hour a fortnight is 1,508 dollars a year. Better coaching than we give, and 62 percent of our subscribers have tried it and stopped paying for it.

$79 a year

Nineteen times cheaper and worse at form correction, which the pricing page says. It turns up every session and remembers what happened last week.

06

Slide 6 · comparison · The app against the thing it actually replaces, priced honestly rather than flatteringly.

UNIT ECONOMICS

One subscriber

Line
Per subscriber
Per month
Note
Trend
Lifetime revenue
$151
$8.90
Blended monthly and annual
Up from $94
Cost to acquire
$31
None
Blended paid and organic
Flat
Hosting and video
$11
$0.65
Falls with scale
Down 18%
Payment costs
$6
$0.35
Card and store fees
Flat
Support
$4
$0.24
One agent per 14,000 subscribers
Down 9%
Contribution
$99
$5.84
66 percent of revenue
Up from $47
Payback
4.0 mo
None
On contribution, not revenue
Was 7.1 months
Measured across the 2026 cohorts. Lifetime is 17 months at the current blended churn.

07

Slide 7 · metrics · The unit economics in a table, because a 9.90 dollar product has to answer the payback question.

One price, one tier

No coaching upsell, no supplements, no premium programme. The app costs the same for everybody who uses it.

Liftwright

$79

per year

Or 9.90 dollars monthly, cancel in two taps

Start training

What is not sold

No supplement affiliate links
No paid coaching upsell
No advertising anywhere
No data sold to anyone

08

Slide 8 · pricing · One price, said plainly, with what is deliberately not sold listed underneath.

The ask

Month one churn is 10 percent and nothing we have built has moved it. Most of this round is aimed at that month.

$4M

Series A, to 320,000 subscribers at 4 percent monthly churn

$1.60M

The first four weeks

Forty percent. Onboarding, the partner match and the first programme, since month one loses more subscribers than months two to six together.

$1.60M

Acquisition

Forty percent. Payback is 4.0 months on contribution, so spend is capped at a five month payback rather than at a channel budget.

$0.80M

Coaching content

Twenty percent. Form video for the 40 lifts people get wrong, which is the one thing a trainer does better than us today.

09

Slide 9 · investment · Four million in three lines, with month one churn named as the thing the money is aimed at.

Every cohort, every month

Churn by cohort month since launch, including the two months in 2025 when it went the wrong way. Sent on request, unedited.

Email

dom@liftwright.example

Phone

+44 161 496 0117

Office

Ancoats, Manchester

10

Slide 10 · closing · Close on the churn number and hand over the cohort file rather than asking for another meeting.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
Put the churn rate on the cover, because hiding it is what every fitness app does.
Slide 2intro
Why fitness apps lose people, framed as a programming problem rather than a motivation problem.
Slide 3pillars
The three retention features, each described by what it does to the churn curve.
Slide 4metrics
Subscribers, churn and price in one row, since the three are the entire business model.
Slide 5metrics
Churn by cohort month for three cohorts, so the effect of the deload feature is visible rather than claimed.
Slide 6comparison
The app against the thing it actually replaces, priced honestly rather than flatteringly.
Slide 7metrics
The unit economics in a table, because a 9.90 dollar product has to answer the payback question.
Slide 8pricing
One price, said plainly, with what is deliberately not sold listed underneath.
Slide 9investment
Four million in three lines, with month one churn named as the thing the money is aimed at.
Slide 10closing
Close on the churn number and hand over the cohort file rather than asking for another meeting.

Slide by slide

Slide one puts subscribers and churn on the cover. Slide two argues that people quit a programme rather than a gym. Slide three is three retention features described by their effect on churn. Slide four is subscribers, churn and price in one row. Slide five is churn by cohort month for three cohorts with four takeaways. Slide six compares a trainer with the app and concedes what the trainer does better. Slide seven is the unit economics of one subscriber with payback on contribution. Slide eight is one price and four things deliberately not sold. Slide nine splits four million with 40 percent aimed at month one. Slide ten offers the cohort file including two months that went the wrong way.

How to adapt this deck

An app with a hardware component moves the unit economics slide forward and adds a device margin line, because payback then includes a physical cost that acquisition spend cannot outrun. A product sold through gyms rather than to individuals replaces the trainer comparison with a per site contract slide, since the buyer is an operator and the churn that matters is the site rather than the member. A company at seed with six months of data shows weekly cohorts and says so, because an honest short series is worth more than a long one assembled from three cohorts.

What this audience asks for

The American College of Sports Medicine publishes the exercise prescription guidance most strength programmes are built from, and the United Kingdom health service publishes its own plain language strength plans for the same audience. Both describe progression as the mechanism that keeps people going, which is exactly what this deck argues on slide two and measures on slide five. A fitness deck that talks about motivation rather than programming is describing a marketing problem, and an investor with a health portfolio will read it that way.

What makes this deck work

Three cohorts show the features working separately

Slide five plots January 2026 before the deload feature, September after it, and March 2027 with the training partner, so month three churn falls from 13 to 8 to 6 percent. One blended curve would prove the product works. Three prove which change did it.

The worst number is on the same slide

The fourth takeaway on slide five says month one is still the worst month and no feature has moved it much. The ask on slide nine then puts 40 percent of the round into the first four weeks. A deck that names its own unsolved problem earns the plan that follows.

The comparison concedes the thing it loses on

Slide six sets 58 dollars a session against 79 dollars a year and says plainly that the trainer is better at form correction, which the pricing page also says. What the app does better is turn up every session and remember last week, which is a narrower and far more believable claim.

Questions people ask

What goes in a fitness app pitch deck?

Why people stop, the features that address it, subscribers and churn and price together, churn by cohort month, what the app replaces, unit economics with payback, pricing and the ask. This example uses ten slides and three of them are about retention.

What churn rate is acceptable for a fitness subscription?

Blended monthly churn under about 7 percent is workable, and the cohort shape matters more than the average. This deck reports 6 percent blended and shows the newest cohort at 4 percent by month five, which is the number that determines the lifetime in the economics slide.

How do I show a churn curve?

By cohort month, with one line per cohort and the feature that changed between them named in the series label. This example uses three cohorts across seven months. A single aggregated churn line cannot show whether anything you shipped actually worked.

Should I compare against a personal trainer?

Yes, because that is the alternative the customer considered. This deck prices a fortnightly session at 1,508 dollars a year against 79, concedes the trainer is better at form and says 62 percent of subscribers tried one and stopped paying.

What do consumer investors ask about payback?

Payback on contribution rather than on revenue, and whether it is falling. This example shows 31 dollars to acquire against 99 of contribution over a 17 month life, giving 4.0 months payback, down from 7.1, and caps acquisition spend at a five month payback.

How many slides for a fitness app raise?

Ten to twelve. This one is ten. Exercise library screenshots and coach credentials are the usual filler in this category, and neither answers the question being asked. A cohort chart, a unit economics table and one honest comparison slide will decide the meeting on their own.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a pitch presentation with AI, then Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .