Parcelsure Series A

Insurtech pitch deck example with the loss ratio on the cover

An insurance investor reads loss ratio before anything else, and a deck that buries it has already told them something. Parcelsure is invented, and it puts 61 percent on the cover and then spends a waterfall slide showing what is left after claims are paid.

Create a presentation with OneCraft10 slides, read in order

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

PARCELSURE

Series A, March 2027

1.2M policies at a 61% loss ratio

Parcel insurance sold inside the checkout, priced per parcel, paid in two days.

Dev Ramanathan

Co-founder and Chief Executive

Slide 1 · cover · Put the loss ratio on the cover, because that is the number the room is waiting for.

Why now

Nobody shops for parcel insurance. It is bought in the two seconds between choosing delivery and paying, or it is not bought at all, which is why it has to live inside another company’s checkout.

The loss is small

A lost parcel is worth about 95 dollars. That is too small to claim through a household policy and too large for a shopper to shrug at.

The carrier will not

Standard carrier liability caps out low and excludes most of what people actually post, so the retailer refunds it and wears the cost.

Checkout is now code

A four dollar policy can be underwritten, priced and issued inside a checkout call. Five years ago that took a broker and a PDF.

02

Slide 2 · intro · Why parcel cover is bought at checkout rather than from an insurer, stated from the shopper side.

Three kinds of partner

Every policy is sold by somebody else. The three channels behave so differently that they are managed as three businesses.

Marketplace

Two marketplaces, 61 percent of policies. Cover is offered on the delivery step and attaches on about one order in nine. Commission 18 percent, the highest we pay, because they own the shopper.

Courier

Four couriers, 27 percent of policies. Sold to the sender at the counter or in the booking flow. Attach rate is higher at 21 percent and commission is lower at 11 percent.

Plugin

About 3,900 small retailers, 12 percent of policies. Installed in a day, no contract, commission 12 percent. Small individually and the fastest growing line we have.

03

Slide 3 · pillars · The three kinds of partner, kept apart because they convert and cost completely differently.

The book, 2026

Twelve months to 31 December 2026, every policy written through a partner checkout.

1.2M

Policies written

Up from 410,000 in 2025. Around 3,300 policies a day across all three channels.

61%

Loss ratio

Claims paid against premium written. It was 74 percent in 2025, before per route pricing.

$4.40

Average premium

One parcel, one policy. Ranges from 2.10 dollars on a tracked letter to 19 dollars on a laptop.

04

Slide 4 · metrics · Volume, loss ratio and average premium in one row, so the three cannot be read apart.

Premium to contribution

Thousands of dollars, full year 2026. Every step is a real cost line, not an allocation.

Gross premium
Claims paid
Partner commission
Claims and platform
Payment costs
Contribution
01500300045006000

05

Slide 5 · metrics · Written premium down to contribution, so nobody has to work the margin out from the loss ratio.

A claim, both ways

Same lost parcel, same value. The industry column is the published average for a small goods claim.

Industry, 14 days

Parcelsure, 2 days

Day 1 to 3. Claimant finds the policy number and fills in a claim form.

Day 3 to 6. Insurer asks for proof of posting and a receipt by email.

Day 6 to 10. File waits in a queue for a human assessor to open it.

Day 10 to 12. Assessor contacts the carrier to confirm the parcel is lost.

Day 12 to 14. Payment approved and sent, usually by bank transfer.

Hour 0. Claim opened from the order page, policy already attached to it.

Hour 0. Tracking pulled from the carrier automatically, no proof of posting asked for.

Hour 1. Rules engine settles 71 percent of claims without a person touching them.

Hour 4. The other 29 percent reach an assessor with the evidence already attached.

Day 2. Paid to the original payment method, median two days end to end.

06

Slide 6 · comparison · Where the twelve saved days actually go, step by step, rather than one blunt claim.

Checkout to policy

One million checkouts in December 2026, followed all the way through to a policy on risk.

Seen

1,000,000 checkouts

Cover is offered on the delivery step, never as a pop up and never pre ticked.

Opened

224,000 opened

22 percent tap the price to see what is covered and what is excluded.

Added

118,000 added

11.8 percent of all checkouts add cover, which is the attach rate we are priced on.

On risk

116,900 policies

99.1 percent of added cover survives payment. The rest are abandoned baskets.

07

Slide 7 · process · The funnel from checkout impression to a live policy, with the drop at each step.

What sits behind the widget

Parcelsure is the distributor and the claims handler. The risk sits with a rated carrier.

Capacity

A rated carrier

One A rated carrier holds the risk under a binder renewed each January, with a 40 million dollar annual aggregate.

Licensing

Appointed representative

We distribute as an appointed representative in every market we sell in, which is what lets a partner embed the product.

Claims authority

Delegated to us

Claims authority is delegated up to 2,500 dollars per claim, which covers 99.4 percent of the book and is why settlement is fast.

Pricing data

Route level history

1.6 million tracked journeys by carrier, route and month. This is the asset that took the loss ratio from 74 to 61.

08

Slide 8 · framework · How the insurance actually works, because a checkout widget is not an insurer.

THE ASK

Nine million, three years

$9M

Series A, to four million policies

Use
Amount
Share
What it buys
Distribution
$3.15M
35%
Twelve partner integrations and the team that lands them
Pricing and data
$1.80M
20%
Route level models and the claims history to train them
Claims automation
$1.35M
15%
Lift straight through settlement from 71 to 90 percent
Solvency capital
$1.80M
20%
Held against the binder, not operating spend
Working capital
$0.90M
10%
Claims are paid before the partner remits the premium
Solvency capital is held against the binder and is not spent. It is in the raise because the carrier requires it.

09

Slide 9 · investment · Nine million in a table, with the capital held against the binder shown as its own line.

The whole case

A 61 percent loss ratio on a four dollar policy

Four million policies at the current premium and loss ratio is 17.6 million dollars of written premium and about 2.1 million of contribution. If the loss ratio drifts back above 68 the plan stops and per route pricing gets fixed before any further distribution is signed. That is the only covenant we are asking the board to hold us to.

dev@parcelsure.example

10

Slide 10 · closing · Close on the one number the loss ratio has to beat, and what happens if it does not.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
Put the loss ratio on the cover, because that is the number the room is waiting for.
Slide 2intro
Why parcel cover is bought at checkout rather than from an insurer, stated from the shopper side.
Slide 3pillars
The three kinds of partner, kept apart because they convert and cost completely differently.
Slide 4metrics
Volume, loss ratio and average premium in one row, so the three cannot be read apart.
Slide 5metrics
Written premium down to contribution, so nobody has to work the margin out from the loss ratio.
Slide 6comparison
Where the twelve saved days actually go, step by step, rather than one blunt claim.
Slide 7process
The funnel from checkout impression to a live policy, with the drop at each step.
Slide 8framework
How the insurance actually works, because a checkout widget is not an insurer.
Slide 9investment
Nine million in a table, with the capital held against the binder shown as its own line.
Slide 10closing
Close on the one number the loss ratio has to beat, and what happens if it does not.

Slide by slide

Slide one puts policy count and loss ratio on the cover. Slide two argues why cover has to live inside a checkout. Slide three separates the three partner types with attach rates and commissions. Slide four is volume, loss ratio and average premium in one row. Slide five is the premium to contribution waterfall. Slide six compares a claim at 14 days with a claim at 2 days, step by step. Slide seven is the checkout funnel from one million impressions to 116,900 policies. Slide eight names capacity, licensing, claims authority and the pricing data asset. Slide nine is the nine million ask as a table, with solvency capital called out as held rather than spent. Slide ten closes on the covenant the plan is prepared to be held to.

How to adapt this deck

A company that underwrites its own risk rather than distributing replaces the capacity slide with a capital and reinsurance slide, and the ask grows by the solvency requirement rather than by the operating plan. A business selling one large policy rather than a million small ones swaps the checkout funnel for a sales cycle slide, because the unit of growth is a broker relationship instead of an impression. A deck built for a reinsurer rather than a venture fund moves the waterfall to second and adds a loss development view, since the reinsurer is buying the book rather than the growth.

What this audience asks for

The Australian prudential regulator publishes what a general insurer has to hold against the risk it writes, and the consumer regulator publishes plain descriptions of how a policy is meant to be explained at the point of sale. Read together they set out the two boundaries an embedded insurance business lives inside: somebody rated has to carry the risk, and the buyer has to be able to understand what they bought in the two seconds they have. A deck that names its carrier, its authority limit and its attach rate has answered both, and an investor with insurance experience will check exactly those three.

What makes this deck work

The waterfall finishes the loss ratio sentence

Slide five walks 5.28 million dollars of written premium down through claims, partner commission, operations and payment costs to 633,000 of contribution. A loss ratio on its own leaves three more questions. Putting every step on one chart answers all of them before anybody has to ask.

The partner slide is three businesses, not one channel

Slide three separates marketplaces, couriers and the plugin, and gives each an attach rate and a commission. Marketplaces pay 18 percent and attach at one order in nine; couriers pay 11 and attach at 21. A single blended distribution number would hide the entire commercial picture.

Capacity, licence and claims authority are named

Slide eight says a rated carrier holds the risk, the business distributes as an appointed representative, and claims authority is delegated up to 2,500 dollars, which covers 99.4 percent of the book. That last clause is the reason two day settlement is possible, and it belongs in the deck rather than in diligence.

Questions people ask

What is different about an insurtech pitch deck?

Two things a software deck does not carry: the loss ratio and the regulatory structure. An insurance investor will not move past either. This example puts the loss ratio on the cover and gives capacity, licensing, claims authority and pricing data a framework slide of their own.

Where does the loss ratio go in the deck?

On the cover or on the first metrics slide, next to volume and average premium. Hiding it until a later slide reads as an attempt to build a story before the number lands. This deck shows 1.2 million policies, 61 percent and 4.40 dollars together so none of the three is read alone.

How do I show unit economics in insurance?

A waterfall from gross written premium to contribution, with claims, commission, operations and payment costs as separate steps. This example uses six steps on one chart. Percentages alone let an audience assume a different cost base than the one you have.

Do I need to explain who carries the risk?

Yes, in one slide. A distributor and an underwriter are different businesses with different capital needs, and an investor who is unclear which one you are will price the round for the more expensive option. This deck names the binder, the aggregate limit and the renewal month.

How many slides should an insurtech deck be?

Ten to twelve. This one is ten. The temptation is to add actuarial detail, and the better place for that is a data room appendix with the triangles in it. The main deck needs one honest chart and one honest structure slide.

What do insurance investors ask about first?

Whether the loss ratio is stable or improving, and why. This deck answers on the metrics slide by reporting 74 percent in 2025 against 61 in 2026 and naming route level pricing as the cause. A loss ratio with no explanation of its direction is a snapshot, not a trend.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a pitch presentation with AI, then Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .