Vantlow Learning: Lead the Floor for Coppervane Insurance

Training provider sales deck example for an HR buyer

A training provider sales deck has to prove to an HR buyer that the programme changes how managers behave at work, and exactly what that costs per cohort. Vantlow Learning, an invented provider, proposes a 12 week programme for the 48 claims team leaders at Coppervane Insurance, also invented, with an outcome for every module, results rated by managers across 41 earlier cohorts and three prices.

Every slide, in order

The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.

PROPOSAL FOR COPPERVANE INSURANCE

Lead the Floor

12 weeks

A leadership programme for new claims team leaders, measured by what their own managers see change.

Vantlow Learning

Prepared for the Head of People

October 2026

Slide 1 · cover · Names the buyer, the programme and the one outcome it is sold on.

Why now

Coppervane promoted 31 of its 48 claims team leaders in the last eighteen months. Most were the best handlers on the floor, and 22 have never had any training in leading people.

48% say yes

Share of claims staff who agree that their team leader gives useful feedback, in the 2026 engagement survey.

22 of 31 untrained

New team leaders who moved straight from handling claims to leading the people who handle them.

1 in 5 leave

Claims staff turnover in the last year, with exit interviews naming the team leader first.

02

Slide 2 · intro · States the buyer problem in the buyer numbers before the programme appears.

Twelve weeks, five stages

Every team leader is rated before and after by the people who see them work every day.

01

Baseline

Week 1. Each leader, their team and their own manager rate eight behaviours.
02

Workshops

Weeks 2 to 10. Five half day modules, one a fortnight, sixteen leaders a cohort.
03

Practice

Between modules. One real conversation on the floor, logged in a short form.
04

Coaching

Weeks 3 to 11. Three one to one calls with a coach who has run a claims team.
05

Re-rate

Week 12. The same eight behaviours rated again, and a report to HR.

About 30 hours per leader over 12 weeks

Five workshops, three coaching calls, five practice tasks

03

Slide 3 · process · Shows the twelve weeks as five stages so HR can see where manager time goes.

THE FIVE MODULES

What each module changes

Week
Module
Practised on the floor
Outcome rated
2
Running a one to one
Weekly 1:1 with every handler
1:1s held as planned
4
Feedback that lands
Two feedback talks logged
Feedback seen as specific
6
Delegating work
Hand off one recurring task
Hours back each week
8
Hard conversations
One performance talk
Issues raised earlier
10
Leading change
Brief the team on a real change
Team can explain why
Each outcome is one of the eight behaviours rated in week 1 and again in week 12.

04

Slide 4 · timeline · Lists the five modules with what each one changes on the floor, which is what an HR buyer signs off.

Results from 41 cohorts

Every cohort since 2023. Change is rated by each leader's own manager at week 12, not by the leader.

612

Team leaders enrolled

Across 41 cohorts of up to sixteen, in nine organisations.

575

Completed all five

Attended every module and the week 12 re-rate.

94%

Completion rate

575 of 612 enrolled. Most who left changed role.

408

Rated clearly better

Leaders whose own manager rated a clear change.

71%

Of those who completed

408 of 575, rated on the same eight behaviours.

+0.6

Team 360 score

Average rise on a five point scale, 3.2 to 3.8.

05

Slide 5 · metrics · Proof from earlier cohorts: completion and the change a leader manager rated, not satisfaction scores.

In person or online

The modules, coaching and re-rate are identical. Only the workshop format and price change.

In person

Online

Five half day workshops at your own office

Leaders off the floor for four hours per module

Strongest cohort bond, most groups keep meeting afterwards

Facilitator travel included in the price

$2,400 per leader, $38,400 per cohort of sixteen

Ten live sessions of two hours, two per module

Shorter blocks that fit around claims volume peaks

Breakout pairs keep practice live, cameras on

Leaders in other offices join the same cohort

$1,700 per leader, $27,200 per cohort of sixteen

06

Slide 6 · comparison · Lets HR choose the delivery mode on time away from the floor and cost, with the same content in both.

Priced per cohort of sixteen

Fixed price per cohort, including coaching, both 360 ratings and the week 12 report to HR.

Online

Ten live sessions, two hours each

$27,200

per cohort

$1,700 per team leader

Three coaching calls each

Week 1 and week 12 ratings

Report to HR in week 12

Choose online

Blended

First and last module in person

$32,000

per cohort

$2,000 per team leader

Three coaching calls each

Week 1 and week 12 ratings

Report to HR in week 12

Choose blended

In person

All five modules on site

$38,400

per cohort

$2,400 per team leader

Three coaching calls each

Week 1 and week 12 ratings

Report to HR in week 12

Choose in person

07

Slide 7 · pricing · Prices per cohort of sixteen, so the buyer can multiply by the number of leaders without asking.

FROM A PEOPLE LEAD

What changed for another buyer

Our team leaders stopped waiting for HR to have the hard conversations for them.

Head of People

A 900 person freight business, four cohorts since 2024

08

Slide 8 · testimonial · One buyer in a similar role saying what changed, in operational words rather than praise.

Three blended cohorts, from February

All 48 claims team leaders through by August 2027, for $96,000. A pilot cohort can start on 2 February.

Pilot cohort

Starts 2 February 2027, sixteen leaders

Email

proposals@vantlow.example

Programme guide

vantlow.example/lead-the-floor

09

Slide 9 · closing · Ends on the specific proposal and start date, so the buyer replies with a decision rather than a question.

The structure

What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.

Slide 1cover
Names the buyer, the programme and the one outcome it is sold on.
Slide 2intro
States the buyer problem in the buyer numbers before the programme appears.
Slide 3process
Shows the twelve weeks as five stages so HR can see where manager time goes.
Slide 4timeline
Lists the five modules with what each one changes on the floor, which is what an HR buyer signs off.
Slide 5metrics
Proof from earlier cohorts: completion and the change a leader manager rated, not satisfaction scores.
Slide 6comparison
Lets HR choose the delivery mode on time away from the floor and cost, with the same content in both.
Slide 7pricing
Prices per cohort of sixteen, so the buyer can multiply by the number of leaders without asking.
Slide 8testimonial
One buyer in a similar role saying what changed, in operational words rather than praise.
Slide 9closing
Ends on the specific proposal and start date, so the buyer replies with a decision rather than a question.

Slide by slide

Slide one names the buyer, the programme and the 12 week length. Slide two states the problem in Coppervane's numbers: 31 of 48 team leaders promoted in eighteen months, 22 never trained, and only 48 percent of staff saying their leader gives useful feedback. Slide three lays out the five stages, from the week 1 baseline to the week 12 re-rate. Slide four is the module table. Slide five gives results from 41 earlier cohorts. Slide six compares in person and online delivery. Slide seven prices the three formats per cohort. Slide eight is one short quote from another people lead. Slide nine closes on three blended cohorts, $96,000, and a pilot start date.

How to adapt this deck

A compliance or safety trainer should swap the manager rating on slide five for the measure the regulator or auditor checks, such as incidents or audit findings, because that is what the buyer reports upward. A provider selling open courses rather than closed cohorts should price per seat on slide seven and drop the cohort size from every headline. A new provider with no cohort history should replace slide five with the baseline and re-rate method from slide three and offer the pilot cohort as the proof, priced so the buyer can stop after it.

What HR buyers look for

The CIPD factsheet on evaluating learning says evaluation has to be linked to an identified performance gap and aligned with business objectives. The Kirkpatrick Model, the most widely used framework for this, splits evaluation into four levels: reaction, learning, behaviour and results. This deck opens on the performance gap from the buyer's own survey and reports at the behaviour level, through ratings by each leader's manager, which is the level most proposals skip.

What makes this deck work

Someone else rates the change

Slide five reports that 408 of the 575 leaders who finished were rated clearly better by their own manager, 71 percent, and that team 360 scores rose from 3.2 to 3.8. An HR buyer has seen plenty of happy sheets. A rating from the person who manages the learner is evidence they can repeat inside their own business.

Every module has a task at work

Slide four pairs each of the five modules with something done on the claims floor and the behaviour that gets rated, such as a weekly one to one with every handler. The buyer can see what changes in week six, not only what is taught in the room.

The price multiplies cleanly

Slide seven prices a cohort of sixteen at $27,200, $32,000 or $38,400, and the close proposes three blended cohorts for all 48 team leaders at $96,000. The buyer can check the sum in their head and take it to finance unchanged.

Questions people ask

What should a training provider put in a sales deck to HR?

The buyer problem in their own numbers, how the programme runs week by week, what each module changes at work, evidence from earlier groups, delivery options and a price that scales with headcount. Close on a specific proposal and start date. Nine or ten slides is enough, and the detail belongs in a written proposal sent afterwards.

Should corporate training be priced per person or per cohort?

Per cohort when the programme runs as a closed group, because your cost is the facilitator and coach time, not the seat. Show the per person figure on the same card, as this deck does with $2,000 a leader inside a $32,000 cohort, so the buyer can budget either way without asking.

What evidence of behaviour change do HR buyers trust?

Ratings from someone other than the learner, taken before and after on the same scale. Manager ratings and team 360 scores are stronger than course feedback because the learner cannot mark their own homework. Report how many people completed, how many improved, and say who did the rating and when.

How do I compare in person and online delivery in a proposal?

Hold the content constant and compare only what differs: time away from work, schedule, cohort bond, reach across offices and price. A side by side slide with five rows each, like slide six here, lets the buyer pick on their constraints rather than wondering whether the online version is a lesser course.

Can I include a client quote without naming the client?

Yes. Give the role and a description instead, such as Head of People at a 900 person freight business, and keep the quote to one operational sentence. Many buyers will ask to speak to that client, so only use a quote from someone who has agreed to take the call.

Can I send this deck as a PDF after the meeting?

Yes. PDF export costs about 1 credit per 10 slides and renders the saved version of the deck, so every table and price card comes out as shown. PowerPoint and editable PPTX exports are on paid plans, which matters if the buyer wants to paste your pricing slide into their own business case.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other presentation examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a pitch presentation with AI, then Export a presentation to PowerPoint or PDF. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .