Conversational form

Manager feedback survey with twelve behaviours rated by frequency

A manager feedback survey lets a team tell its manager, anonymously, which everyday behaviours help them work and which get in the way. This one rates twelve observable behaviours by how often they happen, adds one to ones, development and workload, and ends with one thing to keep and one to change.

Create a form with OneCraft14 fields, 14 required
Top of the manager feedback survey with twelve behaviours rated by frequency example
The top of the form as it renders. The image was generated for this example.

The form itself

The first screen of the form. A conversational form shows one question per screen, so the remaining screens are listed in the field table below. Nothing here can be filled in or submitted, so read it as a reference and build your own from the button above.

Page 1 of 14

How long have you reported to your current manager? *

↵Enter

Every field, and what it collects

The complete field list, in the order respondents meet it.

How long have you reported to your current manager?Single choiceRequired
Options: Less than three months · Three to twelve months · One to three years · More than three years
Which manager is this feedback about?DropdownRequired
Only managers with five or more direct reports are listed, so no result can be traced to one or two people.
Options: Branch manager, Geelong · Branch manager, Ballarat · Branch manager, Bendigo · Warehouse manager, Laverton · Trade counter manager, Laverton · Sales manager, trade accounts · Finance and admin manager
Direction: how often does your manager do this?Rating gridRequired
Statements:
  • Explains what the team is working towards this month
  • Sets clear priorities when everything feels urgent
  • Tells you early when plans or targets change
  • Makes decisions in time for you to act on them
Support: how often does your manager do this?Rating gridRequired
Statements:
  • Gives you feedback you can actually use
  • Notices and mentions work done well
  • Removes blockers you cannot clear yourself
  • Backs you up with customers and other teams
Fairness and openness: how often does your manager do this?Rating gridRequired
Statements:
  • Shares work and overtime fairly across the team
  • Listens to a different view before deciding
  • Admits a mistake and fixes it
  • Treats every person in the team with the same respect
How often do you have a one to one with your manager?Single choiceRequired
Options: Weekly · Every two weeks · Monthly · Less than monthly · Never
Have you talked with your manager about your development in the last six months?Single choiceRequired
Options: Yes, and we agreed next steps · Yes, but nothing came of it · No
Is your workload set at a level you can sustain?Single choiceRequired
Options: Most weeks · Some weeks · Rarely
Could you give this feedback to your manager face to face?Single choiceRequired
Options: Yes, comfortably · With some hesitation · No
Overall, how effective is your manager?Single choiceRequired
1 is not effective, 5 is highly effective.
Options: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
Would you choose to work for this manager again?Single choiceRequired
Options: Yes · Not sure · No
How do you mostly work with your manager?Single choiceRequired
Options: Same site every day · Same site some days · Mostly by phone or video
What is one thing your manager should keep doing?Long textRequired
Describe the behaviour, not a person or an event that could identify you.
What is one thing your manager should change?Long textRequired
One change is easier to act on than a list.

What each screen of this survey collects

Screen one asks how long the person has reported to this manager, in four bands. Screen two picks the manager from seven roles, with a note that only managers with five or more reports are listed. Screens three to five are grids of four behaviours each, direction, support, and fairness and openness, rated never, rarely, sometimes, often or always. Then come six single choice screens: one to one frequency, a development conversation in the last six months, a sustainable workload, whether the feedback could be given face to face, overall effectiveness from 1 to 5, and whether the person would work for this manager again. Screen twelve asks how they mostly work together. The last two screens are long text: one thing to keep and one thing to change. All fourteen screens are required.

Why frequency, not agreement

An agreement scale asks whether a statement is true, so "my manager gives useful feedback" gets a polite agree from people who have had feedback twice in a year. A frequency scale asks how often, which is what the manager can change. Each of the twelve items is a behaviour someone else could watch: telling the team early when plans change, removing a blocker, admitting a mistake. That keeps the report away from personality and close to Monday morning. The threshold on the welcome screen matters as much as the questions. With five answers as the minimum, a branch of three cannot be reported alone, which is why the dropdown lists roles with larger teams only.

How to adapt this survey

A retail chain swaps the branch roles for store managers and replaces the overtime item with one about fair rostering. A software team adds a fourth grid on technical leadership, such as code review turnaround and protecting focus time. A small business with one manager drops the dropdown entirely and runs the survey through an outside adviser so the threshold still holds.

What makes this form work

Twelve behaviours anyone could observe

Items such as "tells you early when plans or targets change" and "removes blockers you cannot clear yourself" describe actions, so a low score points straight at something the manager can do differently.

A threshold built into the questions

The welcome screen promises results only at five or more answers, and the manager dropdown lists only roles with five or more reports. There is no name field anywhere in the fourteen screens.

One keep, one change

The two closing screens ask for a single behaviour each, with placeholders that show the level of detail wanted. One change per person is a list a manager can act on.

Questions people ask

How many responses does a manager need before seeing results?

Five is a common floor, and it is the one this form promises on its welcome screen. Below five, a manager can often guess who answered from the pattern alone. If a team is smaller, combine it with a sibling team or skip the report for that round rather than lowering the threshold quietly.

Should a manager see the comments word for word?

Usually yes, because paraphrased comments lose the detail that makes them useful. The welcome screen says comments are passed on as written, and both comment screens ask for behaviours rather than events. People and Culture can still remove a comment that names someone before the summary goes out.

Is a required matrix fully enforced row by row?

No. Each behaviour grid is required, but the form accepts it once any one row has an answer. In upward feedback that is acceptable, because a new starter may have no view on whether decisions arrive in time. Report each behaviour from the people who rated it, and show the count beside the score.

How is this different from a 360 degree review?

A 360 gathers ratings from the manager's own manager, peers and reports, usually for one person at a time. Upward feedback asks direct reports only, and it runs across every manager at once. It is cheaper and more anonymous, but it misses how a manager works with peers.

How long should a team wait between rounds of manager feedback?

Twice a year suits most teams: often enough that a manager can see whether a change worked, and far enough apart to make one. Keep the twelve behaviours the same between rounds so movement means something. Rotate the open questions if answers start to repeat themselves.

What should a manager do with the results?

Read the lowest frequency items first, share the summary with the team within a fortnight, and choose one behaviour to work on in public. Naming one change is what the thank-you screen promises. A manager who asks the team what "often" would look like for that behaviour usually gets a practical answer.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other form examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Create a conversational form with AI, then Control who can fill in your form. For everything this generator can do, see the form maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .