Bench experiment, five pressures, 100 decay runs

Physics research poster example

Air damping of a torsion pendulum measured at five chamber pressures, laid out as an A0 portrait board where one hero figure takes the whole upper half. Four decay curves on one set of axes carry the result, and the columns underneath say how the fit was tested.

Create a poster with OneCraftA0 Portrait, printed at 841 by 1189 millimetres

The whole board

The poster at full size, exactly as it prints. Every number, citation and caption on it was written for this example, so the layout is being judged on real content.

EU
Air damping of a torsion pendulum from atmosphere to one kilopascal: one hundred decay runs
K. Ostrowski ¹, A. Bhattacharya ¹
1 Department of Physics, Ellisbrook University
ABSTRACT
A torsion pendulum is the standard teaching demonstration of damped oscillation, and the standard treatment assumes damping is proportional to angular velocity with a coefficient that does not depend on amplitude. One hundred decays from 100 to 1 kPa: ring down rose from 41 to 318 s, and one exponential fit each.
1 kPa
3 kPa
100 kPa
10 kPa
01002003000255075100
Figure 1. Amplitude envelope as a percentage of the starting amplitude, four of the five pressures.
Source: 20 free decay runs at each pressure, optical angle sensor at 500 Hz.
METHODS
Apparatus. Teaching torsion pendulum on a 0.2 mm steel wire inside a 40 litre vacuum chamber.
Pressures. Five settings: 100, 30, 10, 3 and 1 kPa, read on a capacitance gauge to 2%.
Runs. Twenty free decay runs at each pressure, released from the same 12 degree amplitude.
Recording. Optical angle sensor at 500 Hz, envelope extracted from successive turning points.
Fitting. Single exponential to the envelope, residual reported as a percentage of full scale.
REFERENCES
1.Bhattacharya, A. (2025) Envelope extraction from turning points in low rate angle data. Review of Teaching Instruments, 12(1), 18 to 33.
2.Kowalczyk, R. and Ostrowski, K. (2024) Linear and quadratic drag in low pressure torsion pendulums. European Journal of Physics Practice, 45(3), 210 to 229.
3.Nakashima, E. (2026) Wire losses as the damping floor. Ellisbrook Physics Notes 2026-01.
RESULTS
Ring down time was 41 s at 100 kPa, 62 s at 30 kPa, 88 s at 10 kPa, 152 s at 3 kPa and 318 s at 1 kPa. Run to run spread was under 4% at every pressure except 1 kPa, where it reached 7% because the decay outlasts the temperature stability of the chamber. Plotted as damping rate, 1/tau, against pressure, the 1 and 3 kPa points extrapolate to a zero pressure ring down of about 700 s, which is the wire.
DISCUSSION
A single exponential fits every one of the hundred decays with a residual under 3% of full scale, and adding a quadratic drag term does not reduce it. The linear viscous model is therefore sufficient over this pressure range and this amplitude, which is what the teaching treatment assumes.
318 s
ring down time at one kilopascal
Against 41 s at 100 kPa, twenty runs at each of five pressures
Key finding
Ring down time rose from 41 seconds at 100 kPa to 318 seconds at 1 kPa, and the wire alone sets a floor near 700 seconds.
Ring down 41 s at 100 kPa, 318 s at 1 kPa
Single exponential fits all 100 runs under 3% residual
Wire floor near 700 s at zero pressure
Teaching apparatus plus a chamber and pump, one afternoon
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The chamber, pump and gauge were borrowed from the second year laboratory and the optical sensor was built from a spare photodiode board. The 30 kPa curve is left out of the figure so four traces stay readable; its ring down time of 62 s is in the results text.

Block by block

What each block on the board is for, in the order a reader walks it.

Title band and two authors
The title gives the range and the effort: air damping of a torsion pendulum from atmosphere to one kilopascal, one hundred decay runs. Two authors share one department affiliation.
Abstract
A wide block that states the assumption under test, damping proportional to angular velocity with a coefficient that does not depend on amplitude, then the test and its answer in one short sentence: one hundred decays from 100 to 1 kPa, ring down rising from 41 to 318 seconds, and one exponential fitting each.
Hero figure
Amplitude envelope as a percentage of starting amplitude, plotted at four time points for 1, 3, 10 and 100 kPa, four of the five pressures. The 100 kPa curve falls to near zero within a hundred seconds while the 1 kPa curve is still near 39% at three hundred.
Methods as a labelled protocol
Five entries: a teaching torsion pendulum on a 0.2 millimetre steel wire in a 40 litre chamber, the five pressures read on a capacitance gauge to 2%, twenty runs released from the same 12 degree amplitude, optical angle recording at 500 hertz, and a single exponential envelope fit.
Results and the headline number
Ring down times of 41, 62, 88, 152 and 318 seconds, with run to run spread under 4% except at 1 kPa. A key number block reads 318 seconds, labelled as the ring down time at one kilopascal against 41 at 100 kPa. The one line conclusion is printed once, in the key finding block.
Model fit
A single exponential fits all one hundred decays under 3% of full scale and a quadratic drag term does not improve it, so the linear viscous model is sufficient over this range. The wire floor comes from damping rates, which add: 1/tau is 1/152 = 0.00658 per second at 3 kPa and 1/318 = 0.00314 at 1 kPa, a slope of 0.00172 per kPa, so the zero pressure rate is 0.00314 less 0.00172 = 0.00143 per second, a ring down of about 700 seconds for the wire alone.
Conclusion, apparatus notes and references
A one line conclusion and four checked points cover the ring down range, the fit, the wire floor and the cost of the apparatus. The apparatus notes record the borrowed chamber and the omitted 30 kPa curve, above three numbered references.

What makes this board work

Four curves on one set of axes

Plotting the amplitude envelope for four pressures together lets a reader see both the ordering and the shape without comparing four small panels. The fifth pressure is left off the figure and reported in the text, which the acknowledgements block says plainly.

The model test is a number

A single exponential fits all one hundred decays to a residual under 3% of full scale, and adding a quadratic drag term does not reduce it. That is a testable claim, unlike saying the fit was good.

The ring down times are all printed

All five ring down times appear in the results text, including the 62 seconds at 30 kPa that the figure leaves out, so a reader can redo the analysis. That matters here, because the wire floor of about 700 seconds comes from 1/tau at 1 and 3 kPa, which a reader can recompute from the printed times.

Questions people ask

What goes on a physics research poster?

The apparatus, the parameter varied and its range, the number of runs, how the measurement was extracted, one figure showing the behaviour, the model tested and the residual. A fit described as good without a residual figure is not a result a reader can use.

How many curves can one poster figure hold?

Four is comfortable because the series colours cycle through four distinct tokens before repeating. A fifth curve takes the first colour again and two lines become indistinguishable, so this board plots four pressures and reports the fifth in the results text.

How big should the hero figure be?

On this layout it takes the full width and roughly the top half of the board below the title, which at A0 portrait is about 1552 by 900 on the working canvas. That is enough for four labelled curves and an axis a person can read from a metre.

What text size works at a poster session?

Body text here is near 24 pixels on the 1656 by 2340 canvas, about 12 millimetres printed, readable at a metre. Axis numbers are smaller by design, so keep the tick labels to a few characters and put units in the caption rather than on every tick.

How do I separate air damping from wire loss in a pendulum?

Damping rates add, so plot 1/tau against pressure. Air damping scales with pressure and the wire does not, so the zero pressure intercept is the wire's own rate and its reciprocal is the longest ring down time possible. This board does that with its two lowest pressures, 152 seconds at 3 kPa and 318 at 1 kPa, and reads a wire floor of about 700 seconds.

How do I adapt this to a different experiment?

Retype the title, abstract and the five method entries, then edit the figure series and categories directly. Each curve is a named series with its own values, so adding or removing a pressure is a data change. The chart can also be switched between ten chart types.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other poster examples

Chemistry research poster example

Three catalyst loadings for one ester synthesis, laid out as an A0 portrait board with the procedure running across the top as a five step chain. A synthetic chemistry poster is read for the method first, so the method is the first thing under the title.

Mathematics research poster example

A mathematics research poster has to make an abstract object readable at two metres, which means stating the model as assumptions a passer by can check rather than as a page of notation. This board fits a standard M/M/c queue to 9,600 recorded clinic arrivals and puts the predicted waiting times next to the observed ones for every session of the clinic day.

Soil science research poster example

Four years of soil organic carbon under cover crops across 24 paired paddocks, laid out as an A0 portrait board built on a before and after grid. The top half sets up the paddocks and the question, the bottom half reports what four years changed, and the figure sits between them.

Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts and diagrams, then choose the template, theme and size. For everything this generator can do, see the poster maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .