Performance improvement plan, Support Analyst, Solent Data Services

Performance improvement plan letter with measurable targets

A performance improvement plan letter sets measurable targets, the support offered and the date performance will be judged. This two page letter from a data services firm puts a support analyst on a 60 day plan, states the gap in numbers, lists three objectives with targets and sets four review dates.

Create a document with OneCraft2 A4 pages, editable, then download as a PDF

The document, page by page

Every page as it renders and as it prints, with nothing summarised. Read the wording before you reuse it.

Solent Data Services
4 Dockside Quay · people@solentdata.example
Performance improvement plan · confidentialPage 1 of 2
Performance improvement plan · confidentialPage 2 of 2

Tuesday 1 September 2026
Private and confidential
Mr Callum Hewitt, Support Analyst, Service Desk

Your performance improvement plan, 1 September to 30 October 2026

Dear Callum, thank you for meeting me on 28 August. This letter confirms what we discussed: a 60 day plan to bring your work up to the standard the role requires, the support you will have, and how and when progress will be judged.

Where performance stands

Over June, July and August your first contact resolution rate was 58 percent, against a team standard of 75 percent and a team average of 79 percent. In August, 14 of your tickets passed their response target without an update to the customer. Your customer satisfaction score is 4.4 out of 5, in line with the team, and that strength is the base this plan builds on.

58%
First contact resolution, last 3 months
75%
Team standard
14
Overdue tickets in August
Objectives
Objective
Measure
Target
Judged on
Resolve more tickets on first contact
First contact resolution, service desk report
75% or more
September and October
Keep customers updated
Tickets past response target with no update
2 or fewer a month
September and October
Use the knowledge base
Articles linked to resolved tickets
60% or more
October
Support you will have
A 30 minute coaching session with me every Tuesday at 2 pm
Two half days shadowing Priya Shah, who has the highest resolution rate on the desk
Time in your roster to complete the knowledge base course by 18 September
A daily ticket ageing report sent to you at 8 am
Reviews and outcomes
Tue 15 Sep
First review
Tue 29 Sep
Second review
Tue 13 Oct
Third review
Fri 30 Oct
Final review

At the final review there are three possible outcomes. If all three targets are met, the plan closes and normal reviews resume. If good progress has been made but a target is not yet met, the plan may be extended once. If there is not enough improvement, the matter may move to the formal performance procedure, which can lead to a warning and, in the end, to dismissal. I want this plan to succeed, and I will tell you at every review exactly where you stand. You may bring a support person to any review.

For Solent Data Services
Name
:
Megan Hartley
Title
:
Service Desk Team Lead

Section by section

What each section is for, so you can keep the ones you need and drop the rest.

Underline letterhead and footer
The firm's name and contact line, and a confidential footer with page numbers.
Addressee and subject
Private and confidential, the employee and the plan's start and end dates.
Where performance stands
Three months of results against the standard, with one strength noted.
Key figures
58 percent, the 75 percent standard and 14 overdue tickets.
Objectives table
Three objectives, each with a measure, a target and when it is judged.
Support you will have
Coaching, shadowing, a course and a daily report.
Reviews and outcomes
Four review dates, the three possible outcomes and the right to a support person.
Signature block
The team lead's name and title.

Turning a vague complaint into a target

Most performance problems start as an impression: slow, careless, not a team player. A plan built on impressions fails, because the employee cannot see what to change and a reviewer cannot judge whether it changed. Start by asking what the impression is based on, then find the figure that shows it. Slow becomes tickets resolved on first contact; careless becomes errors found in a quality audit; not a team player becomes handovers missed. Workplace advisory bodies recommend agreeing standards that are clear, measurable and achievable, and giving the support needed to reach them, which is the structure of this letter.

Weak objectives and measurable ones

Improve communication with customers is weak; update every open ticket at least every 48 hours, measured by the ticket ageing report, is measurable. Be more productive is weak; resolve 75 percent of tickets on first contact over September and October is measurable. Show more initiative is weak and usually best left out unless it can be tied to something observable, such as articles written for the knowledge base. Three objectives are plenty. More than five spreads the employee's effort thinly and makes the outcome letter hard to write.

How to adapt this document

Replace the figures with your own data for at least two months, and keep one genuine strength in the opening paragraph. Rebuild the objectives table so each row has a measure, its source, a target and a date. List only support you will actually provide, with days and times. Set reviews every two weeks and put them in both diaries before sending. Check your performance policy and any award or agreement for steps that must come before or after a plan, and use the same names for those steps in the outcomes paragraph.

What makes this document work

The gap is a number, and so is the strength

First contact resolution of 58 percent against a 75 percent standard and a 79 percent team average, plus 14 overdue tickets in August, define the problem. The same paragraph records a satisfaction score of 4.4 out of 5 in line with the team, so the plan reads as fair rather than a case being built.

Each objective has a measure and a source

The table names the report each figure comes from, the target and when it is judged: 75 percent or more, 2 or fewer overdue tickets a month, 60 percent of tickets linked to articles. Nobody can argue later about what success meant.

Outcomes are said before they happen

The closing paragraph lists the three outcomes, from closing the plan to the formal procedure that can end in dismissal, and promises an update at every review. An employee who reads that on day one cannot say the consequence came as a surprise.

Questions people ask

What is a sensible length for a PIP, 30, 60 or 90 days?

Long enough for the measures to move and for the employee to use the support, usually 30 to 90 days. Sixty days suits a role measured monthly, like this one, because it gives two full months of data. A plan too short to show change looks like a formality; one that runs for six months loses urgency and delays a decision for both sides.

What happens if an employee does not meet the plan?

The employer decides between extending it once, if progress is real, and moving to its formal performance or capability procedure, which may lead to warnings and eventually dismissal. The decision should follow the process the letter described. Write the outcome in a separate letter that records each target against the result, rather than telling the employee in passing.

Should the employee sign the PIP letter?

Asking for a signature to confirm receipt is common, but it should be clear that signing does not mean agreeing with the assessment. Some employers add a received by line; others rely on an email reply. If the employee refuses to sign, note the date the letter was given and by whom, and carry on with the plan.

Can a performance improvement plan be used during probation?

It can, but probation usually has its own review process and a shorter path to ending employment, so a full plan is less common there. Where a new employee is close to the standard, a short plan inside probation can be a fair way to decide whether to confirm, extend or end it. State which process applies so the employee knows.

What makes a PIP objective measurable?

It names the measure, where the figure comes from, the target and the period it is judged over. Keep customers updated is a wish; two or fewer tickets past the response target with no update, per month, from the service desk report, is an objective. If you cannot say where the number will come from, the objective is not ready to put in a letter.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other document examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Write the plan from a description, then Add the objectives table and timeline. For everything this generator can do, see the document maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .