Classic form

Data breach report form for the NDB scheme

A data breach report form lets staff report a suspected breach quickly: when it was found, what information and how many people, how it happened, whether it is contained and whether it could cause serious harm. This Australian version explains the Notifiable Data Breaches test in plain words and leaves the assessment to the privacy officer.

Create a form with OneCraft10 fields, 9 required
Top of the data breach report form for the ndb scheme example
The top of the form as it renders. The image was generated for this example.

The form itself

A static copy of the finished form, exactly as it renders. Nothing here can be filled in or submitted, so read it as a reference and build your own from the button above.

Internal data breach report

Bluebird CRM privacy team. Complete as soon as you suspect personal information has been lost, accessed or disclosed without authority. Do not wait to be sure, and do not try to investigate on your own.

Discovery

Harm and notification

Under the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme, an eligible data breach is one likely to result in serious harm to any of the people affected, where action has not removed that likelihood. Give your view; the privacy officer makes the assessment.

Every field, and what it collects

The complete field list, in the order respondents meet it.

Discovery

Date discoveredDateRequired
Time discoveredTimeRequired
Information involvedMultiple choiceRequired
Options: Names and contact details · Dates of birth · Financial or bank details · Government identifiers · Health information · Passwords or login details · Customer CRM records · Employee records
People affected, best estimateNumberRequired
How did it happen?Single choiceRequired
Options: Sent to the wrong person · Lost or stolen device or paper · Unauthorised access by an outsider · Unauthorised access by staff · System error or misconfiguration
Is it contained?Single choiceRequired
Options: Yes, recovered or access closed · Partly · No, still happening or unknown

Harm and notification

Could this cause serious harm to anyone affected?Single choiceRequired
Options: Likely · Possibly · Unlikely · Not sure
Who already knowsMultiple choice
Options: My manager · IT security · The customer whose data it is · Nobody yet
Your name and teamShort textRequired
Reporter signatureSignatureRequired

What each field on this form collects

Date and time discovered come first. A required checklist of eight information types follows, from names and contact details to health information and passwords. A number takes the estimated people affected. Two single choices record how it happened, from a misdirected email to a system error, and whether it is contained. A paragraph explains the serious harm test, then the reporter gives their view of likely harm. A checklist records who already knows, and the reporter's name, team and signature close it.

Report first, assess second

Under the Privacy Act, an organisation that suspects an eligible data breach must take reasonable steps to assess it within 30 days, and notify the people affected and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner if it is likely to cause serious harm. The clock starts when the organisation becomes aware, which in practice means when a staff member notices. That is why the intro says not to wait to be sure and not to investigate alone. The form gives the privacy officer the facts needed to start the assessment the same day.

The serious harm question

Serious harm can be financial, physical, psychological or reputational, and it depends on the kind of information, who has it and whether anything has been done to remove the risk. Health information and identity documents carry more risk than a list of email addresses. The reporter is asked for a view, with a Not sure answer, because they often know things the privacy officer does not, such as who received a misdirected file. The assessment itself stays with the privacy officer, as the paragraph says.

How to adapt this form

A health practice adds the patient record system involved and whether clinical care could be affected. A school adds whether information about children is involved. A business outside Australia replaces the paragraph with the rules that apply to it, such as the UK GDPR's 72 hour reporting rule.

What makes this form work

The test in plain words

The paragraph states the serious harm test in two sentences. Staff answer the harm question knowing what it means, and the privacy officer gets a view that is easy to interpret.

Containment is asked early

Is it contained, with yes, partly or no. A breach still happening needs action in the next hour, and that answer tells the privacy officer which reports to read first.

Who knows already

A checklist of manager, IT security, the customer or nobody. The privacy officer knows who to call and avoids contacting someone who has already been told.

Questions people ask

What is a notifiable data breach in Australia?

Under the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme, an eligible data breach happens when personal information is lost or accessed or disclosed without authority, it is likely to result in serious harm to someone, and the organisation has not been able to prevent that likely harm. Organisations covered by the Privacy Act must then notify affected people and the OAIC.

How long does a business have to assess a breach?

An organisation that suspects an eligible data breach must take reasonable steps to complete an assessment within 30 days. If the breach is eligible, it must notify as soon as practicable. Fast internal reporting gives the assessment the most time, which is the point of this form.

Should staff contact the affected people themselves?

No. The privacy officer decides how and when to notify, so the message is accurate and consistent and nothing is said that makes matters worse. The thank you screen asks reporters to keep evidence and wait. Contact the people affected only when the organisation decides to.

Is a misdirected email a data breach?

It can be, if it contains personal information and goes to someone not authorised to see it. Whether it is notifiable depends on the information and the likely harm. Many breaches reported to the OAIC are human error such as misdirected emails, which is why it is the first cause option.

Can this form be anonymous?

This version asks for the reporter's name, because the privacy officer usually needs to ask follow up questions quickly. A business that wants anonymous reports can make the name optional or use a whistleblower channel for reports about misconduct.

Who receives the report?

The form owner sees every submission in the responses table, and the email alert add-on can send each one to the privacy officer's address as it arrives. Limit access to the responses, since breach reports contain sensitive details.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other form examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Alert the privacy officer by email, then Restrict reporting to staff. For everything this generator can do, see the form maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .