Succession plan 2026 to 2030, Morvath Engineering

Succession plan template with critical roles and readiness

A succession plan has to name the roles a business cannot lose, who could step into each and how ready they are, and what will be done to make them ready before the day comes. This five page plan for a second generation engineering firm covers five critical roles, eight candidate ratings, ten development actions, a handover timeline to 2029 and the triggers that bring it forward.

Create a document with OneCraft5 A4 pages, editable, then download as a PDF

The document, page by page

Every page as it renders and as it prints, with nothing summarised. Read the wording before you reuse it.

Morvath Engineering
Approved 9 February 2026

Succession plan 2026 to 2030

Who steps into each critical role, how ready they are today, and what happens before and after the founder's son hands over the business.

Prepared by
Board of directors
Date
Approved 9 February 2026
Morvath Engineering, succession plan 2026 to 2030. Board confidential.Page 2 of 5
Morvath Engineering, succession plan 2026 to 2030. Board confidential.Page 3 of 5
Morvath Engineering, succession plan 2026 to 2030. Board confidential.Page 4 of 5
Morvath Engineering, succession plan 2026 to 2030. Board confidential.Page 5 of 5
1. Why this plan, and why now

Morvath Engineering designs and builds conveyor and materials handling systems for quarries, grain terminals and recycling plants. It was founded in 1979 by Arthur Morvath and has been run since 2004 by his son, Daniel Morvath, as managing director. Today it employs 64 people and carries a forward order book of about 14 months.

Daniel intends to step back from day to day management by mid 2029, stay on the board as chair, and keep his shareholding. Two other people hold knowledge the business cannot run without: the engineering manager, who is 62, and the commercial manager, who estimates every job. Clients and the bank have both asked what happens if any of the three leaves. This plan answers them, and separates the question of who leads the firm from the question of who owns it.

Leadership, not ownership
This plan covers who runs the business. Who owns it, including any transfer of Daniel's shares to family members or staff, is dealt with in the shareholders' agreement and the family's estate planning, and is out of scope here.
2. Critical roles

A role is critical when losing its holder without warning would stop jobs, lose clients or breach a licence. Each is rated on two things: how much of its knowledge lives only in one head, and how soon the holder may leave.

Role
Holder
Knowledge held only by them
Likely exit
Risk
Managing director
Daniel Morvath
Client relationships with the top 10 accounts, the bank
Mid 2029
High: planned, but no successor yet
Engineering manager
Gwen Pellard
Design standards, registered engineer sign off
2027 to 2028
High: near retirement, single signatory
Commercial manager
Sam Okoro
Estimating rates, supplier terms
Not planned
Medium: key person, no deputy
Workshop manager
Lee Tran
Fabrication scheduling, welding procedures
Not planned
Medium: deputy partly trained
Finance manager
Ruth Abara
Job costing, cash flow forecasts
Not planned
Low: external accountant can cover
Role
Holder
Knowledge held only by them
Likely exit
Risk
Managing director
Daniel Morvath
Client relationships with the top 10 accounts, the bank
Mid 2029
High: planned, but no successor yet
Engineering manager
Gwen Pellard
Design standards, registered engineer sign off
2027 to 2028
High: near retirement, single signatory
Commercial manager
Sam Okoro
Estimating rates, supplier terms
Not planned
Medium: key person, no deputy
Workshop manager
Lee Tran
Fabrication scheduling, welding procedures
Not planned
Medium: deputy partly trained
Finance manager
Ruth Abara
Job costing, cash flow forecasts
Not planned
Low: external accountant can cover
Role
Holder
Knowledge held only by them
Likely exit
Risk
Managing director
Daniel Morvath
Client relationships with the top 10 accounts, the bank
Mid 2029
High: planned, but no successor yet
Engineering manager
Gwen Pellard
Design standards, registered engineer sign off
2027 to 2028
High: near retirement, single signatory
Commercial manager
Sam Okoro
Estimating rates, supplier terms
Not planned
Medium: key person, no deputy
Workshop manager
Lee Tran
Fabrication scheduling, welding procedures
Not planned
Medium: deputy partly trained
Finance manager
Ruth Abara
Job costing, cash flow forecasts
Not planned
Low: external accountant can cover
3. Candidates and readiness

Readiness is rated on the board's scale: ready now, ready in 1 to 2 years with development, ready in 3 or more years, or emergency cover only. Every critical role has at least one candidate who is ready now as emergency cover, even if the long term successor is not.

Role
Candidate
Readiness
Strengths and gaps
Managing director
Sam Okoro, commercial manager
1 to 2 years
Knows every client and margin. Gap: people leadership beyond a team of 4, board reporting.
Managing director
Priya Morvath, project manager
3 or more years
Strong on delivery, family member. Gap: commercial and financial experience.
Managing director
Ruth Abara, finance manager
Emergency cover
Can run the business for 6 months with the board. Not seeking the role.
Engineering manager
Marcus Eide, senior design engineer
1 to 2 years
Leads design on half of jobs. Gap: registration as a professional engineer, due 2027.
Engineering manager
External hire
If needed
Recruit only if Marcus is not registered by June 2027.
Commercial manager
Ana Silveira, estimator
1 to 2 years
Prices jobs under $250,000. Gap: large tenders, supplier negotiation.
Workshop manager
Tom Hadley, leading hand
Ready now
Runs the floor when Lee is away. Gap: weekly planning software.
Finance manager
External accountant
Emergency cover
Contract in place for month end and payroll.

Priya Morvath is a candidate on merit, not because of her surname, and is assessed on the same scale as everyone else. The board has agreed that the next managing director will be chosen in 2028 from whoever is ready then.

4. Development actions

Each candidate has a development plan agreed with them. The actions below are the ones the board tracks.

Candidate
Action
Sponsor
By
Sam Okoro
Lead the operations meeting and report monthly to the board
Daniel Morvath
From Jul 2026
Sam Okoro
Complete a company directors course
Board
Dec 2026
Sam Okoro
Take over the bank and insurer relationship with Daniel present
Daniel Morvath
Jun 2027
Priya Morvath
Six month placement in estimating with Sam
Sam Okoro
Jan to Jun 2027
Priya Morvath
Manage the cash flow for two major jobs
Ruth Abara
Dec 2027
Marcus Eide
Submit professional engineer registration
Gwen Pellard
Mar 2027
Marcus Eide
Co sign every design with Gwen, then sign alone with her review
Gwen Pellard
Jul 2026 to Jun 2027
Ana Silveira
Price two tenders over $1 million with Sam reviewing
Sam Okoro
Dec 2026
Tom Hadley
Train on the planning software and run the schedule for a month
Lee Tran
Sep 2026
All
Write down estimating rates, design standards and key client histories
Each role holder
Dec 2026
5. Timeline
February 2026, plan approved
Candidates told they are in the plan and what it means for them.
December 2026, knowledge captured
Estimating rates, design standards and client histories written down and stored centrally.
June 2027, engineering decision
Marcus registered and signing designs, or the board starts an external search.
Late 2027, engineering handover
Gwen moves to three days a week as a reviewer, then retires.
March 2028, managing director chosen
The board assesses the candidates and appoints the successor designate.
July 2028 to June 2029, handover year
The successor runs the business with Daniel as executive chair; clients and the bank are introduced in person.
July 2029, Daniel becomes chair
The new managing director takes full authority; Daniel chairs the board.
February 2026, plan approved
Candidates told they are in the plan and what it means for them.
December 2026, knowledge captured
Estimating rates, design standards and client histories written down and stored centrally.
June 2027, engineering decision
Marcus registered and signing designs, or the board starts an external search.
Late 2027, engineering handover
Gwen moves to three days a week as a reviewer, then retires.
March 2028, managing director chosen
The board assesses the candidates and appoints the successor designate.
July 2028 to June 2029, handover year
The successor runs the business with Daniel as executive chair; clients and the bank are introduced in person.
July 2029, Daniel becomes chair
The new managing director takes full authority; Daniel chairs the board.
February 2026, plan approved
Candidates told they are in the plan and what it means for them.
December 2026, knowledge captured
Estimating rates, design standards and client histories written down and stored centrally.
June 2027, engineering decision
Marcus registered and signing designs, or the board starts an external search.
Late 2027, engineering handover
Gwen moves to three days a week as a reviewer, then retires.
March 2028, managing director chosen
The board assesses the candidates and appoints the successor designate.
July 2028 to June 2029, handover year
The successor runs the business with Daniel as executive chair; clients and the bank are introduced in person.
July 2029, Daniel becomes chair
The new managing director takes full authority; Daniel chairs the board.
6. Triggers

The plan runs on the timeline above unless one of these events happens first. Each trigger has a set response, so nobody has to decide under pressure what the plan meant.

Trigger
Response
Daniel dies or is unable to work for more than 4 weeks
Ruth Abara acts as managing director with the board for up to 6 months; the board brings forward the appointment of the successor.
Gwen leaves before Marcus is registered
Engage the external registered engineer on retainer to sign designs; Marcus continues to lead design.
A candidate resigns
The board reviews readiness for that role within 30 days and names a new candidate or starts recruiting.
An offer to buy the business
The plan is paused for the board and shareholders to consider the offer; candidates are told.
Order book falls below 6 months
Development actions with a cost are deferred; knowledge capture continues.
7. Review

The board reviews this plan every February and after any trigger. At each review it rates every candidate again, checks each development action, and confirms the dates in section 5 still hold. Candidates see their own rating and actions; the full plan stays with the board.

Section by section

What each section is for, so you can keep the ones you need and drop the rest.

Cover
Executive cover with the firm, the plan period and the approval date.
1. Why this plan, and why now
The firm, the planned exit, and leadership kept separate from ownership.
2. Critical roles
Five roles rated on single person knowledge and likely exit.
3. Candidates and readiness
Eight candidate ratings with strengths and gaps.
4. Development actions
Ten actions with sponsor and due date.
5 to 7. Timeline, triggers and review
Seven milestones to 2029, five triggers with responses and the yearly review.

How to adapt this document

First, start with your own list of single points of failure rather than an org chart; the person who knows the supplier terms may matter more than a department head. Second, if you are a larger organisation, add a column for diversity of the candidate pool and a talent review meeting each year. Third, if the owner is also selling, keep this plan for leadership and run the sale in a separate exit plan, linking the two timelines.

What makes this document work

Risk is rated on what lives in one head

The critical roles table does not just list senior titles. It records the knowledge only the holder has, such as the estimating rates and supplier terms the commercial manager keeps, and how soon each holder may leave. The engineering manager at 62 with sole sign off rates high; the finance manager, covered by an outside accountant, rates low.

Readiness is honest, including for family

Eight candidates are rated on one scale, from ready now to emergency cover only. The founder's granddaughter is rated 3 or more years away and the plan says she is assessed like everyone else, with the managing director chosen in 2028 from whoever is ready then.

Triggers remove guesswork

The plan runs to a timeline, but five triggers each carry a set response: if the managing director cannot work for 4 weeks, the finance manager acts with the board for up to 6 months; if the engineering manager leaves early, a retained registered engineer signs designs.

Questions people ask

Which roles belong in a succession plan?

Roles whose sudden loss would stop work, lose clients or breach a licence or registration, not simply the most senior ones. In small firms this often includes a technical signatory or an estimator alongside the owner. Rate each on how much knowledge only the holder has and how soon they may leave, and plan first for those high on both.

How should successor readiness be rated?

Use a short scale everyone understands, such as ready now, ready in one to two years, ready in three or more years, and emergency cover only. Rate against what the role needs, list each candidate's strengths and gaps, and rerate every year. A role with nobody ready now needs at least an emergency cover name.

Should candidates be told they are in the succession plan?

Usually yes, with care. Telling a candidate lets them agree a development plan and stay engaged, while silence can lose them to a competitor. Avoid promising the role, because readiness can change. A common approach, used here, is that candidates see their own rating and actions while the full plan stays with the board.

How is a leadership succession plan different from ownership succession?

Leadership succession decides who runs the business; ownership succession decides who holds the shares and how they are transferred, valued and taxed. Family firms often mix them up, and the person best placed to lead may not be the person who inherits. Keeping them in separate documents lets each be decided on its own merits.

How far ahead should a succession plan look?

Three to five years suits most small and medium firms, long enough to develop a successor through a professional registration or a management course. Plan for both a planned exit, with a timeline, and an unplanned one, with emergency cover that works from tomorrow. Review it every year and after any trigger.

Build your own in about a minute

The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.

Make one like this

Other document examples

Want the steps in the builder? Read Create a document with AI, then Add a cover page to your document. For everything this generator can do, see the document maker.

Sources

Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .