Tenvale Series A
Proptech pitch deck example for a rental platform
A proptech investor wants to know whether the saving is real and whether the sale repeats. Tenvale is invented, and its eleven slides prove the first with a paired study on the same properties and the second with a monthly line of active agencies.
Every slide, in order
The whole deck as it renders, one slide after another. Read it the way the audience would.
The structure
What each slide is doing, so you can reuse the order even with different content.
- Slide 1cover
- State the business in one line and put the tenancy count on the cover.
- Slide 2intro
- Why inspections are the bottleneck, written as one long argument rather than bullets.
- Slide 3pillars
- What the product does, in four parts, each one a thing a property manager stops doing.
- Slide 4process
- One inspection as six timed steps, so the 25 minute claim is auditable.
- Slide 5comparison
- Where the 65 saved minutes come from, step by step, so it is not one blunt claim.
- Slide 6metrics
- The three numbers an investor holds on to, with the growth rate explained rather than asserted.
- Slide 7metrics
- Active agencies over eighteen months, the number that tells you whether the sale repeats.
- Slide 8pricing
- One price, said plainly, with what is not charged for listed underneath.
- Slide 9framework
- The two state expansion as a grid, so the tenancy pool and the legal work are visible side by side.
- Slide 10investment
- Six million in four lines, with the state launch share sized against the tenancy pool it opens.
- Slide 11closing
- Close with four ways to get the numbers, since an agency buyer and an investor want different files.
Slide by slide
Slide one puts the tenancy count on the cover. Slide two is a single long argument about what 90 minutes a property does to an agency. Slide three is the four jobs the app does. Slide four walks one inspection in six timed steps. Slide five is the paired study table that explains the 65 minutes. Slide six is tenancies, revenue and monthly growth with the pricing logic written beside them. Slide seven is active agencies over eighteen months. Slide eight is the single price per tenancy and what is not charged for. Slide nine is the two state expansion as a four panel grid. Slide ten splits six million four ways. Slide eleven gives investors and agencies separate ways to get in touch.
How to adapt this deck
A platform selling to landlords directly rather than to agencies drops the agency line chart and replaces it with property count, because there is no rent roll to migrate and the sales motion is entirely different. A company operating in one country with a single tenancy law cuts the expansion grid to one panel and uses the space for a second product line. A deck aimed at a strategic acquirer rather than a venture fund moves the paired inspection study to second, since an acquirer is buying the measured saving and already understands the market.
What this audience asks for
New South Wales Fair Trading publishes what a condition report has to record and how a bond claim is decided, and the Queensland Residential Tenancies Authority publishes its own equivalent with different forms and different timing. Reading the two side by side is the fastest way to understand why a state expansion in this sector is a product change rather than a marketing exercise, and it is also the check an experienced property investor will run on an expansion slide. A deck that names the forms and the notice periods that differ has already answered the question that ends most of these conversations.
What makes this deck work
The time saving is itemised, not asserted
Slide five is a seven row table that adds to 65 saved minutes, and one of those rows shows the app being three minutes slower at sending the report. A saving broken into steps that do not all point the same way is much harder to dismiss than a single headline figure.
Revenue and tenancies are the same line
Slide six states that the price is 14 dollars per tenancy per month, so the revenue line and the tenancy line cannot diverge. 18,400 tenancies at that price is 3.09 million, which is the 3.1 million on the card. Nothing else has to be taken on faith.
The expansion slide separates what carries over
Slide nine splits Queensland and Western Australia into the tenancy pool and the legal work, then adds two rows for what carries over and what does not. Every state expansion pitch claims the product is the same everywhere. This one names the forms and the notice periods that are not.
Questions people ask
What goes in a proptech pitch deck?
The job that is slow today, what the product does about it, a measured comparison, the units under management, the revenue those units produce, the price, the expansion plan and the ask. This example uses eleven slides and spends two of them on the inspection itself.
How do I prove a time saving to an investor?
Run the same task both ways on the same properties and publish the steps. This deck compares 280 paired inspections in 2026, same managers, same properties, four weeks apart, and breaks 90 minutes against 25 into seven steps. A single before and after number with no method is treated as marketing.
Why price per tenancy rather than per user?
Because the tenancy is the unit the agency is paid on, so the bill moves with the agency revenue rather than with its headcount. It also makes the revenue line easy to audit: multiply tenancies by price. Per seat pricing in this market punishes an agency for hiring and gets negotiated every year.
How many slides should a proptech deck be?
Ten to twelve. This one is eleven. Property software decks tend to balloon because every state has a different rule set, and the discipline is to put the differences on one framework slide rather than spreading them through the deck.
What do property investors ask about first?
Agency count and agency churn, before tenancy count. An agency that leaves takes its whole rent roll, so the number of agencies is the real risk measure. This deck puts 340 agencies, 54 tenancies each and 2 percent churn on the chart slide for exactly that reason.
Does a state by state expansion need its own slide?
In Australia, yes. Each state prescribes its own condition report and bond authority, so an expansion is a product change and not just a sales hire. This example gives it a four panel framework slide and names the two things that do not carry over.
Build your own in about a minute
The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.
Make one like thisOther presentation examples
Robotics pitch deck example with the payback per robot
A robotics pitch deck has to prove that each robot earns back what it costs to build, because hardware investors fund fleets, not demos. Palletix, an invented warehouse picking robot rented by the month, shows 62 robots on contract and a 14 month payback built from four lines in a table.
Logistics startup pitch deck built on cost per delivery
A fleet buyer and a logistics investor will both accept exactly one number, and it is the cost of one drop. Routeworks is invented, and its eleven slides carry that number from the cover to the ask, proved on one matched Tuesday rather than on a demo.
HRtech pitch deck example built around retention numbers
An HR software buyer is measured on one number every quarter, and a deck that does not move it is a deck about features. Tenure is invented, and its eleven slides are organised around 90 day attrition, with the buyer described before any of the metrics appear.
Want the steps in the builder? Read Make a pitch presentation with AI, then Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides. For everything this generator can do, see the presentation maker.
Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .