Pulse Payroll
Feature comparison slide with a tick and cross matrix
A feature comparison slide is only worth the space when the rows disagree, because a matrix of ticks all the way across tells a buyer nothing and a matrix of ticks down one column tells them it was written by the vendor. This one compares Pulse Payroll, a fictional product, against two fictional rivals on seven features that actually differ.
What is on the slide
- Columns
- Feature, then Paycircle, Wagebox and Pulse Payroll, with the last column in the brand colour.
- Rows one to four
- Award interpretation built in: cross, add on, tick. Rostering in the same app: cross, cross, tick. Unscheduled pay runs: limited, tick, tick. Employee self service app: tick, cross, tick.
- Rows five to seven
- Super clearing house included: tick, add on, tick. Timesheet approval by manager: cross, tick, tick. Accounting sync with Xero and MYOB: tick, tick, Beta.
- Honest gap
- The final row gives the vendor column a Beta rather than a tick, so the table is not a clean sweep.
When this is the right slide
A tick and cross matrix suits a feature comparison slide when the buyer has already named the features that matter and every row has a different answer across the products.
What to swap it for
Comparison: Feature Matrix Table. Swap to the feature matrix table when the cells need words rather than marks, for example limits, prices or conditions that a tick would flatten into a claim.
What this slide shows
A small eyebrow reads PAYROLL above the title Pulse Payroll Against Two Rivals. Under it sits a four column matrix: a feature column, then Paycircle, Wagebox and Pulse Payroll, with the rightmost column in the brand colour. Seven rows follow. Award interpretation built in is a cross for Paycircle, an add on for Wagebox and a tick for Pulse. Rostering in the same app is a cross, a cross and a tick. Unscheduled pay runs is limited, a tick and a tick. An employee self service app is a tick, a cross and a tick. A super clearing house included is a tick, an add on and a tick. Timesheet approval by manager is a cross, a tick and a tick. Accounting sync with Xero and MYOB is a tick, a tick and Beta. The feature column is wider than the three product columns, so the row labels never wrap and the ticks and crosses stay in line down the page. The three product columns sit at equal width, so no column is given more room to explain itself than the others.
When this is the right slide
Use it late in a sales conversation, when the buyer is comparing named products and has already agreed what matters. It suits a competitive sales deck, a shortlist presentation or a procurement response where the evaluator wants the answers side by side. It is the wrong slide when the cells need explanation, because a tick cannot carry a condition and a footnote under the table will not be read; a feature matrix table with text cells handles that. It is also wrong early in a sale, before the buyer has decided which features matter, since a matrix of seven rows chosen by the vendor answers questions nobody asked. Where the comparison is about price and target market rather than features, a landscape table with a row per competitor is the better shape.
How to adapt it
First, pick rows the buyer named, not rows the product wins. A matrix built from a discovery call is persuasive; a matrix built from a feature list is a brochure. Second, keep one honest gap. Every product is behind somewhere, and naming it is what makes the other six rows believable to an evaluator who knows the market. Third, use qualifiers rather than crosses where a cross would be unfair, because a rival who charges extra for a feature does have it and an evaluator will know. Update the table on a date rather than when it suits, and put that date in the deck notes so an old matrix is never presented as current. Where the audience is an evaluation panel rather than a single buyer, add a short line in the deck notes naming the source for each rival column, because the first challenge in a scored process is almost always about where the information came from and a presenter who can answer that in one sentence keeps the rest of the table intact.
What makes this slide work
Every row has at least two different answers
Award interpretation is a cross, an add on and a tick. Rostering is two crosses and a tick. Unscheduled pay runs are limited, a tick and a tick. A row where all three columns agree is a row that changes no decision, and there is not one on this slide. That is the only rule that makes a feature matrix worth reading.
The last row admits a gap
Accounting sync with Xero and MYOB reads tick, tick, Beta. A matrix where the vendor column is a clean sweep is read as marketing, and a buyer who spots one exaggeration discounts the whole table. Naming the one place the product is behind buys credibility for the six rows above it.
Qualifiers do the work a tick cannot
Add on, Limited and Beta each say something a cross would flatten. Add on means the feature exists for a price, Limited means it exists with a catch, Beta means it is coming. Keeping those three words short lets them sit in a cell without wrapping, so the column still scans as a column.
Questions people ask
How many features belong in a comparison matrix?
Five to seven on a slide, and this one carries seven. Above that the rows get thin and the type shrinks below what a projector can hold. A long matrix belongs in a written response or a spreadsheet, where an evaluator can sort and filter rather than read a wall of marks from the back of a room.
How do you choose which features to compare?
Take them from the buyer. Features named in a discovery call or a tender document carry weight; features chosen by the vendor read as selection bias, which is exactly what they are. A row where all three products are the same wastes a line, so those go even when they matter, with a note that parity was checked.
Is it fair to include competitors in a sales deck?
It is normal, provided every column is described the way its own documentation describes it and the comparison carries a date. Using a qualifier such as add on rather than a cross where a rival charges extra is both more accurate and more persuasive, because evaluators usually know the market better than the slide assumes.
Should the vendor column ever show a cross?
Yes, or at least a qualifier. A column of unbroken ticks is read as marketing and invites the audience to test the weakest row. This slide gives its own product a Beta on accounting sync, which costs one row and buys credibility for the six above it. One honest gap is worth more than seven claims.
When should the matrix be split into two slides?
Split when the features fall into groups an evaluator scores separately, such as payroll compliance and workforce management. Split also when any cell needs more than one word, because that is a different layout rather than a bigger one. A matrix that has grown to fifteen rows is a document, not a slide.
How should this slide be presented out loud?
Name the two rows the buyer raised in the last meeting and stop. Reading twenty one cells aloud takes two minutes and nobody retains it. The value of the matrix is that it can be left on screen while the conversation happens, so the evaluator can check the rows nobody mentioned without interrupting.
Build your own in about a minute
The button below opens the generator with this use case already described. Change the wording to match your own, generate, then edit anything you like.
Make one like thisOther slide examples
Old way new way slide on two opposing bands
An old way new way slide is the easiest slide in a deck to lose the room with, because the moment the old way is described unfairly the audience stops believing the new one. This one belongs to Hartley Uniforms, a fictional supplier, and states each way as a single sentence naming what the process actually involved.
Overlap slide example with two circles and side lists
An overlap slide earns its place when the shared ground is written first and the two outer lists are what is left over. This one belongs to Ledgerline, a fictional software firm, and settles which team owns which part of the revenue process.
Build vs buy slide with one costed verdict a side
A build versus buy slide decided on the build price alone always picks buy, because the build number arrives as a single project figure and the licence arrives as a small annual one. This one belongs to Westport Health District, a fictional health service, and compares the two over five years rather than over the first eighteen months.
Want the steps in the builder? Read Add charts, maps and diagrams to slides, then Make a pitch presentation with AI. For everything this generator can do, see the slide maker.
Written and checked by the OneCraft team. Last checked .